Marray,

Thank you for your review and feedback.  I provide a response to your comment 
embedded below.

-- 
 
JG



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email protected] 
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email protected]>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>

On 2/18/21, 1:38 AM, "Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: No Objection

    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)


    Please refer to 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1V9MhP2vFFQnfND2u5O_gWaF97j6-WioM4ZtM_jcmBB5rtxVEvJvCtTTrNadirKbQTZy_YKjEoO29yaxFpYsNicRmjBKxNfEXcqr5l5lL80e7Fib30g96uoFhoJKPf8tNRhS9HQKk6aee_vqZUvPWedOmPHu2Zi3iQWoPH26mG2CSuVlgpJ2ejXfvYBwT4ybRvfLH8HSZRyvPZ_qqzSJyQ34Zrlly56DJO3UzwrpCLTqAbAmLj-Fjngy9Y3n54KCN/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Cc7ovmtopDDPD8capA2ejuILbPbumvmILt8l0lOx8vWBAGxdVLGdnQoLqjb932rQwIFNIhTxyg6IdAzn8nCSS5O_IgQxgVFm5WnuTFoXaiIy1xcMml-0BfzHQd5wc66keNQQVoRvCyXC18-zc3ML15N7uh6dhC22_qvv_5XWiGrRrNBWFe4gQ7cz9TVrn8u3fH0Dbqnf4eU8QSJ54_zI0MYKS0aevbewDLuc_nxnckRTmCpbDeqTimIDjZndgGAP/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Why are the SHOULD and SHOULD NOT in Section 5 not MUST and MUST NOT?

JG - This was set as a SHOULD and SHOULD NOT since it's based on an 
interpretation of RFC 5730 that the server only accepts object-level commands 
based on the negotiated services in the EPP session.  Since this draft is 
focused on unhandled namespaces it was felt to make it a recommendation with 
the SHOULD and the SHOULD NOT.  

    Thank you for including Section 9.




_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to