Francesca, 

Thanks for the review and feedback.  Good catch on the copy/paste issue in 
section 5.2.  The first paragraph will be removed, since the second paragraph 
contains everything of the first with additional content.  

Thanks,

-- 
 
JG



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email protected] 
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email protected]>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>

On 4/20/21, 10:35 AM, "Francesca Palombini via Datatracker" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: No Objection

    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)


    Please refer to 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1REIya3_2eBEP2D-BRm17ZAqceIPtjYhppxsod_kyljnVM7h1u0Ksr9yjutCW2s0gaGLGDviIiP3PjOvPCjPnJSVt0uRdx6FrDcYK0NeYllgpdiGbW1VQwvjhzvmMNwXKI7J4y04_s8iK3aYxsnLLKzjl68RJ12VAJE0_z_bGrb192acEmb03fFQLeusOeG_xMdkF9gwMEfK8OdLLDPjR-gueq9KkB_y3xkUPXxAHtnLAZCQY3wjm0NJHuQ-1rQYs/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html
    for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    
https://secure-web.cisco.com/187BFcZg4bBS-o7ktiGOGtlb2Aq3av0Ozfg_XsYlkXEwFxsTMzglOS-K5p-UY-HsN0dch19uXC7RvXUbHTEVotJkXx-yEMB6yD6P_n57hrtbhJovDcGIzZXsHI-pjggKol2Z9UvF5fTurK0fTeZ4hR7eVMj4ku9t4ON3fHJr4LKXWBKJWwZdDyk4gkhICuWkktipjEgvR0pHKLTT93vgAiGHCP1vU7S4gQeC0ZD7vpiDS5lVilziVfj_g_j04vYeh/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer%2F



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thank you for the work on this document. Also thanks to the shepherd Jody
    Kolker for explaining in the shepherd write up why this has been brought
    forward as std track, and doing the necessary XML checks. I only have one 
minor
    comment below.

    Francesca

    1. -----

       For an update command, the registry MUST allow for the setting and
       unsetting of the authorization information.  The registrar sets the
       authorization information by first generating a strong, random
       authorization information value, based on Section 4.1, and setting it
       in the registry in the update command.

    FP: Curious case of copy-paste of this entire paragraph in Section 5.2.




_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to