I'm sorry but I think this sentence

"maint" is used as an abbreviation for
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0".


is misleading - it is used as, and only as, an example XML namespace
prefix, mapped to the URN. Which is just fine. It's not a general-purpose
abbreviation in this document. The word "abbreviation" does not appear in
the XML namespaces spec and this terminology would appear strange to an XML
practitioner.

The answer seems to be "but we use this wording in this whole family of
RFCs".  OK, my objection stands and I think this WG should abandon this
nonstandard and misleading language, but I guess my objection should be
non-blocking.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:23 AM Tobias Sattler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Murray,
>
> We addressed the point on the XML schema by changing the URI as suggested;
> and explained our reasoning behind the “maint” abbreviation.
>
> The IANA experts want to get back to us as soon as they have new
> information.
>
> If there are no other change requests, we are ready to release an update.
>
> Would you please let us know if anything else is needed?
>
> Thank you,
> Tobias
>
> On 16. Aug 2021, at 11:07, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:01 AM The IESG <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from the Registration Protocols
>> Extensions WG
>> (regext) to consider the following document: - 'Registry Maintenance
>> Notifications for the Extensible Provisioning
>>    Protocol (EPP)'
>>   <draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-16.txt> as Proposed Standard
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final
>> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> [email protected] mailing lists by 2021-08-11. Exceptionally, comments
>> may
>> be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning
>> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>
>>    This document describes an Extensible Provision Protocol (EPP)
>>    extension called "Registry Maintenance Notification", used by EPP
>>    servers to notify EPP clients and allow EPP clients to query EPP
>>    servers on maintenance events.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
>>
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>
> This has completed Last Call.  However, IANA's expert reviewers have
> raised some issues that are visible in the datatracker.  Is someone looking
> into these?
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to