Hi All,

I’m glad that my bad phrasing at least got some action into this discussion.
I didn’t mean to say that we can’t have 2 standards, but we should at least 
have clarity on the status of this document.
Because the original document title was "jcard-deprecation 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-jcard-deprecation/>",
 and the introduction still talks about the intent and transition mechanisms to 
replace jCard, we can be a bit clearer that jsContact is a second standard, at 
least until jCard can be deprecated from support in RDAP after jsContact is 
sufficiently supported.

When we all agree jsContact is a second standards track document not intended 
to deprecate jCard just yet today, then that’s fine.
If we don’t get feedback this document should have a different status than 
standards track, then the chairs will add that intended status next week.

Which leaves the remaining questions Mario posted in his original message.

- -- 
Antoin Verschuren








> Op 8 dec. 2021, om 14:53 heeft Gould, James 
> <jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> I view the jscontact is a valid use case for a standards track RDAP 
> extension.  We have many similar use cases for standards track extensions in 
> EPP, where the RFCs couldn't envision a feature or an approach that comes up 
> later.  The jscontact draft needs to be defined as an RDAP extension that is 
> optional, with the appropriate signaling, and with transition considerations 
> to support a transition from the jCard defined in RFC 9083 to JSContact 
> defined in the extension.  I don't foresee that support for jCard will go 
> away, but that JSContact can be become an alternative and potentially a 
> preferred format for the RDAP contact data.  As Scott points out, supporting 
> multiple formats can add complexity, but I believe that is a known cost to 
> progress.      
> 
> -- 
> 
> JG
> 
> 
> 
> James Gould
> Fellow Engineer
> jgo...@verisign.com <mailto:jgo...@verisign.com> 
> <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com 
> <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>>
> 
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
> 
> Verisign.com <http://verisign.com/> <http://verisigninc.com/ 
> <http://verisigninc.com/>>
> 
> On 12/8/21, 5:31 AM, "regext on behalf of Gavin Brown" 
> <regext-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of 
> gavin.br...@centralnic.com <mailto:gavin.br...@centralnic.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>    On 8 Dec 2021, at 09:55, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it 
> <mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Il 07/12/2021 14:42, Marc Blanchet ha scritto:
>>> 
>>>> Le 7 déc. 2021 à 08:35, Hollenbeck, Scott 
>>>> <shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org 
>>>> <mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> We can *certainly* do that, Mario. It’s the option I support because there 
>>>> is a cost to replace a jCard implementation once it’s been implemented and 
>>>> deployed. Make it an optional extension and let server operators decide 
>>>> if/when they want to make the change.
>>>> 
>>>> I note that this will make life more difficult for client implementors 
>>>> because they’ll have to support both formats.
>>> 
>>> But the genie is already out of the bottle… I.e. if one have done a client 
>>> implementation, it has already support for jCard. Adding the JSContact is 
>>> just more code.  There will be only less work if one is implementing a 
>>> client in the future after the whole ecosystem had moved to JSContact, 
>>> therefore no need to implement jCard, which is still a good win, as I guess 
>>> that many haven’t implemented a client yet since whois is still dominant 
>>> and RDAP is not yet at the same level.
>> +1
>> 
>> Every extension requires an implementation effort and every transition 
>> process from the old to the new requires a period where both coexist. 
>> 
>> If we hadn't been aware of that, we wouldn't have started the process to 
>> replace Whois with RDAP. And, like Marc pointed out, this process is still 
>> at the beginning  and we still don't imagine when it will really be 
>> completed.
>> 
>> In addition to that, I wonder why some members are so worried about the 
>> implementation effort done in this case in comparison to other extensions 
>> that completed the reviewing process.
> 
>    Speaking as a client implementer, the amount of work required to update my 
> RDAP client to support JSContact was minimal - which speaks to how much 
> easier JSContact is to work with than jCard. You can see every change 
> required in https://client.rdap.org <https://client.rdap.org/> here:
> 
>    
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1_Pf0XRu1tk3UR9-6jZ90CvItjm2neWOUbvFQlelz4q63NRctDM-rSfl0bSRaAV5EIV9aE7ka0U0or5uuTlvu68I6aSE7VnsWBMFLUFRToK6mDmJVHxBBFK9ztDZYSfxcAMaVmIUkFCaAOHPItTkzGJXFdCLs60lPUJp2yLiotBDfMlMsuDyuTUll6Ztrs4m3Vj8YoUgfwCkcXc0kxZzpigQikmbW3FGPQi8p2bgQ2NvJay4AkRznJp9CFRCj47UD/https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.centralnic.com%2Fcentralnic%2Frdap-web-client%2F-%2Fcompare%2Fba4fd514...c9deae03
>  
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1_Pf0XRu1tk3UR9-6jZ90CvItjm2neWOUbvFQlelz4q63NRctDM-rSfl0bSRaAV5EIV9aE7ka0U0or5uuTlvu68I6aSE7VnsWBMFLUFRToK6mDmJVHxBBFK9ztDZYSfxcAMaVmIUkFCaAOHPItTkzGJXFdCLs60lPUJp2yLiotBDfMlMsuDyuTUll6Ztrs4m3Vj8YoUgfwCkcXc0kxZzpigQikmbW3FGPQi8p2bgQ2NvJay4AkRznJp9CFRCj47UD/https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.centralnic.com%2Fcentralnic%2Frdap-web-client%2F-%2Fcompare%2Fba4fd514...c9deae03>
> 
>    Getting JSContact working in the CentralNic RDAP server took a bit more 
> work, but I see it as being worthwhile if it makes life easier for client 
> implementers.
> 
>    We are still in the early days of RDAP, and the amount of RDAP code that 
> exists now is much smaller than the amount of RDAP code still to be written. 
> If we can make a modest change now that makes that future code smaller and 
> easier to write and maintain, we should do so.
> 
>    (full disclosure: I am a co-author on this draft).
> 
>    G.
> 
>> 
>> For example, why haven't we been so concerned about the implementation 
>> effort required to client and servers in order to implement the EPP Login 
>> Security extension and the consequent period where clients and servers 
>> should deal with both the password formats ? And what about the 
>> implementation effort done to replace custom solutions already existing with 
>> new standard solutions?
>> 
>> Honestly, it seems to me that the implementation effort required in this 
>> case is lower than the one required by other extensions.
>> 
>> I believe that the main point is if we (intended as most of us) finally 
>> agree that the benefits from implementing an extension far outweigh the 
>> required efforts and we have evidence that 
>> 
>> the new will be significantly better than the old (and it seems to me we 
>> have it in this case).
>> 
>> But, at the same time, we are not sure that the majority of EPP or RDAP 
>> operators will implement it. That's it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> That being said, IMO, the status of this document should remain "Standard 
>> Track".
> 
>    +1
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Mario
>> 
>>> 
>>>> “Be liberal in what you accept” applies.
>>> 
>>> yes.
>>> 
>>> Marc.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Scott
>>>> 
>>>> From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
>>>> Behalf Of Mario Loffredo
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 3:45 AM
>>>> To: Antoin Verschuren <ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org 
>>>> <mailto:ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org>>; regext@ietf.org 
>>>> <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] New Version Notification for 
>>>> draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt
>>>> 
>>>> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
>>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
>>>> content is safe. 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> maybe I'm missing something but is there anybody explaining me why we can 
>>>> have two standards for the email address in EPP but we cannot have two 
>>>> standards for the contact card in RDAP ?
>>>> 
>>>> I admit that the reasons supporting the two documents are different but 
>>>> their matters appear very similar to me. 
>>>> 
>>>> Using JSContact inside RDAP is basically an extension. 
>>>> 
>>>> If we remove stages 3 and 4 of the transition from the document, we simply 
>>>> have an RDAP extension that is or isn't implemented  by a server.
>>>> 
>>>> This extension can be firstly signaled by the server, then requested by 
>>>> the client and consequently returned by the server just as it happens for 
>>>> the EAI extension in the EPP context. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Mario
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Il 06/12/2021 15:29, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
>>>> Hi all, 
>>>> 
>>>> In addition to the questions from Mario, we still need to discuss the 
>>>> status of this document as discussed during the IETF112 meeting:
>>>> 
>>>> "the document doesn’t have designated status; it was adopted without a 
>>>> status (on purpose). We need to think about the implications. Encouraged 
>>>> group to discuss/comment on the list”
>>>> 
>>>> Meaning that because jCard is not depreciated with publishing this 
>>>> document, what will the status of this document be? We cannot have 2 
>>>> standards, so we need to say something about it.
>>>> 
>>>> Jim and Antoin
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Op 27 nov. 2021, om 09:04 heeft Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it 
>>>> <mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> this new version addresses the feedback provided by Jasdip except for the 
>>>> following two points left for WG discussion:
>>>> 1) In the sentence "To aid interoperability, RDAP providers are 
>>>> RECOMMENDED to use as map keys the following string values and labels 
>>>> defined in [RFC5733].", should "are RECOMMNEDED                            
>>>>    to" be replaced with "MUST"?
>>>> 2)  Does the portion of the spec for jCard to JSContact transition 
>>>> signaling add significant implementation overhead for RDAP servers and 
>>>> clients? Could an out-of-band (OOB) method have been employed?
>>>> 
>>>> Three more implementations were included.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Mario
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -------- Messaggio Inoltrato -------- 
>>>> Oggetto: 
>>>> New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt
>>>> Data: 
>>>> Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:53:34 -0800
>>>> Mittente: 
>>>> internet-dra...@ietf.org
>>>> A: 
>>>> Gavin Brown <gavin.br...@centralnic.com>, Mario Loffredo 
>>>> <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Mario Loffredo and posted to the
>>>> IETF repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Name: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact
>>>> Revision: 04
>>>> Title: Using JSContact in Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) JSON 
>>>> Responses
>>>> Document date: 2021-11-26
>>>> Group: regext
>>>> Pages: 22
>>>> URL: 
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uQaV0-jKtv71LGZlehOyaCbEn5S_Ja8HUolF3Idzs0e_X6-FOVJo79ccBlXhH8Pa8WvTzUORi1a4SnzxhrQs9woY7UjWIOVqZPWMMunD7Bcq-tk4w7ZBo0KaQJamS2bsqxpinoIQrlih28J7rvcPOJvt5q3ipkkJrjPDHmTGMLqO4pbwQKGB6A0GhAYFY9okn0vW4vpToNQYDmzNZzOP55THKmNPeTVzrti-rjdlQTOCYfeZM51CaTqCyLt6YIw5/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uQaV0-jKtv71LGZlehOyaCbEn5S_Ja8HUolF3Idzs0e_X6-FOVJo79ccBlXhH8Pa8WvTzUORi1a4SnzxhrQs9woY7UjWIOVqZPWMMunD7Bcq-tk4w7ZBo0KaQJamS2bsqxpinoIQrlih28J7rvcPOJvt5q3ipkkJrjPDHmTGMLqO4pbwQKGB6A0GhAYFY9okn0vW4vpToNQYDmzNZzOP55THKmNPeTVzrti-rjdlQTOCYfeZM51CaTqCyLt6YIw5/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt>
>>>> Status: 
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1W_ZuCoeBQhlTAUM5Z4ZRKIx4K4jKuM1qJmBOKp5AeZk08Q1SxXm-qT_tC8nx1df8B4MjwdiE6nSQoTqiDxRNprsFJiPNDME0adRxhA48D6EAVpmf-tkCz5bUXAADdgF6CoWqR6WxYFZmGo0KRa2we7JFlk50h-ctdzsZUjT0nODUALd0zPW4yJCJTvw4iLkaJpOSNC2eYsyl5AiC3sWSkwfi4aJCpDrrUs8nTOdLRH77boJLF-mKuuJxiNwoBQ1B/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact%2F
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1W_ZuCoeBQhlTAUM5Z4ZRKIx4K4jKuM1qJmBOKp5AeZk08Q1SxXm-qT_tC8nx1df8B4MjwdiE6nSQoTqiDxRNprsFJiPNDME0adRxhA48D6EAVpmf-tkCz5bUXAADdgF6CoWqR6WxYFZmGo0KRa2we7JFlk50h-ctdzsZUjT0nODUALd0zPW4yJCJTvw4iLkaJpOSNC2eYsyl5AiC3sWSkwfi4aJCpDrrUs8nTOdLRH77boJLF-mKuuJxiNwoBQ1B/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact%2F>
>>>> Htmlized: 
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Cx_B5RCTVwDAOt-QueJSoDp-xCQRSwYHOs3GoOtvUod_GALzjZbsE8G709DjYM10Ov8nGy4cFBWN3Lab20GfYe5tHFGy1pEEWXlt-PphwRDAt4BeFbP7JZAuzLh_MpFzyjeH2n-VK76nVNke2vzRLycvn_8zKBdNDZIObxdVSaPcesu0y8AXiid_qroZDoq6XFetaOmahdPzI4bg_fCPAoAJGpIoZmkOPi26F4sNiWZ9ESYHiqkjJqYzdXKkryBn/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Cx_B5RCTVwDAOt-QueJSoDp-xCQRSwYHOs3GoOtvUod_GALzjZbsE8G709DjYM10Ov8nGy4cFBWN3Lab20GfYe5tHFGy1pEEWXlt-PphwRDAt4BeFbP7JZAuzLh_MpFzyjeH2n-VK76nVNke2vzRLycvn_8zKBdNDZIObxdVSaPcesu0y8AXiid_qroZDoq6XFetaOmahdPzI4bg_fCPAoAJGpIoZmkOPi26F4sNiWZ9ESYHiqkjJqYzdXKkryBn/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact>
>>>> Diff: 
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1__y1AKzAWuKGNWrnDe1VzsI7jBkHbv-zIQJRkstV46WKKjLnIPWqu3L8brOPX9PsHJQQRBSTTRPlhh5rkFYg9alryyCc7HKf2TDH9wtlV6v7SmYP1vp9OjLBNITEz1J5dLVJoYpdD5-uErtfV9fuHTsY-zXDBi9b7f_zH_OwFkuz9weCyN7xw1shHH4GgfaGi5L2jwSG-eiz9DdcgeY64p9QRb1xWgHVEgNOvyzX6XwX-o8PoZg-rCwCqIqDm8PR/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Frfcdiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1__y1AKzAWuKGNWrnDe1VzsI7jBkHbv-zIQJRkstV46WKKjLnIPWqu3L8brOPX9PsHJQQRBSTTRPlhh5rkFYg9alryyCc7HKf2TDH9wtlV6v7SmYP1vp9OjLBNITEz1J5dLVJoYpdD5-uErtfV9fuHTsY-zXDBi9b7f_zH_OwFkuz9weCyN7xw1shHH4GgfaGi5L2jwSG-eiz9DdcgeY64p9QRb1xWgHVEgNOvyzX6XwX-o8PoZg-rCwCqIqDm8PR/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Frfcdiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04>
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>> This document describes an RDAP extension which represents entity
>>>> contact information in JSON responses using JSContact.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> regext mailing list
>>>> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> regext mailing list
>>>> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Dr. Mario Loffredo
>>>> Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
>>>> Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
>>>> National Research Council (CNR)
>>>> via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
>>>> Phone: +39.0503153497
>>>> Web: 
>>>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1xIJoQsdiqp7TXVZSFzGEv8YUUvMoNSA3xaMYxkUI-7W8J25Bgr_Q7kvU04yiMB5aMxRncUD_XuByVtVf40IgGbgUKStfdITYBlOn9XJGHggHoNU13YTUMVK7Un4qI-4fnvZ-iqewk7VhgipQTtrIP9YQT5OE0sP7dhHtS3vkMuean0twqDZkeTWdAeplpoiFQDyLKIm4ZCE0vWNM5_UPH7Cy_q0PuU3hfEcXXguCSKYRGsFNavPifomzaHAJ4Kb7/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iit.cnr.it%2Fmario.loffredo
>>>>  
>>>> <http://secure-web.cisco.com/1xIJoQsdiqp7TXVZSFzGEv8YUUvMoNSA3xaMYxkUI-7W8J25Bgr_Q7kvU04yiMB5aMxRncUD_XuByVtVf40IgGbgUKStfdITYBlOn9XJGHggHoNU13YTUMVK7Un4qI-4fnvZ-iqewk7VhgipQTtrIP9YQT5OE0sP7dhHtS3vkMuean0twqDZkeTWdAeplpoiFQDyLKIm4ZCE0vWNM5_UPH7Cy_q0PuU3hfEcXXguCSKYRGsFNavPifomzaHAJ4Kb7/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iit.cnr.it%2Fmario.loffredo>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> regext mailing list
>>>> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>>>  
>>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> regext mailing list
>>> 
>>> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>>>  
>>> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
>> -- 
>> Dr. Mario Loffredo
>> Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
>> Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
>> National Research Council (CNR)
>> via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
>> Phone: +39.0503153497
>> Web: 
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1xIJoQsdiqp7TXVZSFzGEv8YUUvMoNSA3xaMYxkUI-7W8J25Bgr_Q7kvU04yiMB5aMxRncUD_XuByVtVf40IgGbgUKStfdITYBlOn9XJGHggHoNU13YTUMVK7Un4qI-4fnvZ-iqewk7VhgipQTtrIP9YQT5OE0sP7dhHtS3vkMuean0twqDZkeTWdAeplpoiFQDyLKIm4ZCE0vWNM5_UPH7Cy_q0PuU3hfEcXXguCSKYRGsFNavPifomzaHAJ4Kb7/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iit.cnr.it%2Fmario.loffredo
>>  
>> <http://secure-web.cisco.com/1xIJoQsdiqp7TXVZSFzGEv8YUUvMoNSA3xaMYxkUI-7W8J25Bgr_Q7kvU04yiMB5aMxRncUD_XuByVtVf40IgGbgUKStfdITYBlOn9XJGHggHoNU13YTUMVK7Un4qI-4fnvZ-iqewk7VhgipQTtrIP9YQT5OE0sP7dhHtS3vkMuean0twqDZkeTWdAeplpoiFQDyLKIm4ZCE0vWNM5_UPH7Cy_q0PuU3hfEcXXguCSKYRGsFNavPifomzaHAJ4Kb7/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iit.cnr.it%2Fmario.loffredo>
> 
>    --
>    Gavin Brown
>    Head of Registry Services
>    CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
>    
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1jdq3DW0oaBcuR8g7MK_IAFftZoi9qNQONY2gbBkcdtkzdjgpDNfAwYhCiPXpzLJx7HXceBvuSlI_YmyAn4hM1OtmSzGtnkvhT7wTNN-A1uf1diCSDeMC34FjGmy4-gX_nzIyAgYI1aBek26Xy4yD9s4tM4zavbIJoxuOUNW1B-wh4eTwoZapI_RokIhaWWC2HwMDBlXqYBH66u-ZBms7vWKubbJ_g-YAiph8xJTCNzw1U155bn-_zQkjygvnJHS_/https%3A%2F%2Fcentralnicregistry.com
>  
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1jdq3DW0oaBcuR8g7MK_IAFftZoi9qNQONY2gbBkcdtkzdjgpDNfAwYhCiPXpzLJx7HXceBvuSlI_YmyAn4hM1OtmSzGtnkvhT7wTNN-A1uf1diCSDeMC34FjGmy4-gX_nzIyAgYI1aBek26Xy4yD9s4tM4zavbIJoxuOUNW1B-wh4eTwoZapI_RokIhaWWC2HwMDBlXqYBH66u-ZBms7vWKubbJ_g-YAiph8xJTCNzw1U155bn-_zQkjygvnJHS_/https%3A%2F%2Fcentralnicregistry.com>
> 
>    Cal: http://cnic.link/gbcalendar <http://cnic.link/gbcalendar>
> 
>    CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with 
> company number 8576358. Registered Offices: Saddlers House, Gutter Lane, 
> London EC2V 6BR.
> 
>    
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/13-E0oRnwyeA8SenfNfBy4KMSGtCic3FVW1vcuJDPs9XkobKDsEK0YgbQpenao1bT_oCMeSL8v7X7dPPo_gFf_bXkz8tTZU92gvbXuBLb478kPPRkPRaJii-ywI_5V6zzMjROQ4O6fCkU2zeI5OntXAtYcD9BSWMQJAnDjXel6jy_Gli1quLEb9mnco30J8Uq_pyE_rhM3IQeFQCCeZJCNgadiftyUVNRwAPI-HnqgmDiTqbJ2Q2E5saGwX7Xsu4a/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.centralnic.com
>  
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/13-E0oRnwyeA8SenfNfBy4KMSGtCic3FVW1vcuJDPs9XkobKDsEK0YgbQpenao1bT_oCMeSL8v7X7dPPo_gFf_bXkz8tTZU92gvbXuBLb478kPPRkPRaJii-ywI_5V6zzMjROQ4O6fCkU2zeI5OntXAtYcD9BSWMQJAnDjXel6jy_Gli1quLEb9mnco30J8Uq_pyE_rhM3IQeFQCCeZJCNgadiftyUVNRwAPI-HnqgmDiTqbJ2Q2E5saGwX7Xsu4a/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.centralnic.com>
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    regext mailing list
>    regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>    
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>  
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-yb-57do9pn1MCHOdXmj15RKh_-Ull0dVu2cfvvH15Gti90YKFeNhBhj2ykIWxZgJ2j8BaYf-4TxPq75aoXjTqf0sFN3AyFWIo74k376pubPrT1E7z_wvqtwK5RpZgX_Nsa2NAVmKRr9HxhSIEt778NFHI2wCbsBi8gVnDpMnAfXKXdVSh03KTvqYZVaR9wVxluNfJC2IFHM5voS8BdnPfJ6teILwZOZflHWT1TVKg9NYeF1bgIugt5iQtMahv4o/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to