My comment below.

Jasdip

From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 10:17 AM
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Jasdip Singh <jasd...@arin.net>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-10.txt




Le 17 févr. 2022 à 08:24, Hollenbeck, Scott 
<shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
 a écrit :

From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 12:12 PM
To: jasd...@arin.net<mailto:jasd...@arin.net>; 
regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: 
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-10.txt

Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.

From: Jasdip Singh <jasd...@arin.net<mailto:jasd...@arin.net>>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 10:34 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott 
<shollenb...@verisign.com<mailto:shollenb...@verisign.com>>; 
regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: 
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-10.txt

Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.

Hello Scott,

I like the overall direction of this draft to help simplify things for RDAP 
clients and facilitate adoption, but wanted to share couple of observations:

1. There are 3 newly proposed RDAP path segments, starting with “login”, 
“session”, and “logout”. Looks like, for simplicity, we could coalesce them as 
“session/{start|refresh|end}”, with “login” becoming “session/start”, and 
“logout” “session/end”. “device” and “devicepoll” could be appended in the path 
as-n-when needed.

[SAH] What do you all think of this suggestion? The draft currently has 
“login”, logout”, and “session” path segments. Should they be combined?

[SAH] I’m going to make a suggestion in the absence of any feedback. I’d like 
to remove the session path segment and combine it with the login path segment 
such that the draft will describe the following path segments:

/login
/login/status
/login/refresh
/login/device
/login/devicepoll
/logout

This eliminates the session path segment and merges the functionality with the 
“easier to understand” login/logout semantics.

I would prefer to have a single endpoint for the “sessions”, as current 
practice. How about:

/session/login
/session/status
/session/refresh
/session/device
/session/devicepoll
/session/logout

[JS] Like this better if everyone agrees. :)

Regards, Marc.



Any issues?

Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext


_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to