On 21 April 2022 16:35:25 CEST, "Gould, James" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1 on the use 2103/"Unimplemented extension". This is a broader topic with >the passing invalid or conflicting extensions (e.g., restore request extension >of update along with the sync extension). >
2103 would suggest that the extension is not implemented at all IMHO. I'd return 2002 "Command use error" to indicate that there is a sequence error, but in the end it's probably more or less cosmetics. HTH, _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
