Hi all, thanks for sending this along. And thanks for including Section 7.
1) In Section 3, you have: "The validation rules introduced in RFC 6531 are considered to be followed." I don't quite understand this sentence. Do you mean this? "It is assumed that addresses used with this extension will pass the validation rules introduced in RFC 6531." If not, please clarify. 2) In Section 5.3.1, "it implies possibility to" is missing a "the". 3) For Section 8, I suggest this to get rid of the layered SHOULD/RECOMMENDED: "To reduce the risk of future usability errors, registries SHOULD validate all code points in the domain name of any provided email address according to IDNA2008 [RFC5892]." Then again, usability errors aren't something I would expect to be discussed in a Security Considerations section, so maybe this should be someplace else? 4) You might want to say something explicit about all of the EAI security issues also applying to this work. -MSK
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
