Dear Yoshiro,


On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:04 AM Yoshiro Yoneya via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> Summary:
>
>   This draft is in good shape regarding protocol.  Regarding to operation,
>   having an additional guidance for registrar transfer from EAI supporting
>   registrar to non EAI supporting registrar would be better.
>
> Major issues:
>
>   None.
>
> Minor issues:
>
>   When a registrant who has only EAI contact addresses attempts to
> transfer a
>   domain from EAI supporting registrar to another non EAI supporting
> registrar,
>   then transfer of contact information will cause failure.  If there were
>   additional operational guidance addressing this issue in this draft will
> be
>   helpful for registrar operators.  For example, when loosing registrar
> who is
>   supporting EAI received a transfer request, it should check whether the
>   registrant has only EAI contact addresses, and if it was true, the
> registrar
>   should advice the registrant to provide alternative ASCII contact
> addresses
>   in advance for the successful transfer.
>
> Many thanks for your review!

Yes, transfer becomes impossible in such situations, but the operational
practices are beyond the scope of this document.
It's more a matter of, say, ICANN recommendations.

-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to