On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:27 AM Gould, James <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Changing the definition of the rdapConformance from an array of strings to an
> array of objects is certainly new and has never been defined.
Correct, but that's not what I proposed. The example JSON from my
previous email is below. I proposed to use the existing mechanism
which is an array of strings.
{
"rdapConformance" : [ "rdap_level_0", "exampleNicV1", "exampleNicV1_modA"],
"exampleNicV1_foo": {
"bar": "buz",
"exampleNicV1_modA_bar": "bazz",
}
....
}
> The existing definition of the /help query doesn't respond with anything
> formal for automatic consumption by software clients for the purpose of
> auto-discovery.
The /help query responds with a normal RDAP response, which will have
the rdapConformance string array used by clients to know the
extensions the server supports.
-andy
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
