The co-Chairs wanted to acknowledge receipt of this message and, in fact, we 
had taken note of the request on 18 August.

Recall that as a small working group the co-Chairs have decided that we’ll only 
do one WGLC at a time.

Given that we have two requests for WGLC call that are pretty close together, 
what we’ve decided is the we’ll follow our milestones.  So, the search document 
will go to WGLC first and as soon as that closes we’ll run a WGLC for the 
OpenID document.

We’re not expecting any substantive concerns with either document and if that 
remains true then both documents will be done well before IETF115!  In fact, 
the reporting and redacted documents should also be ready to go and with any 
luck we can get those done before IETF115, too - HINT HINT.

Thanks to all,

Antoin and Jim


On 29 Aug 2022, at 10:07, Marc Blanchet wrote:

>> Le 29 août 2022 à 10:01, Hollenbeck, Scott 
>> <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>> I originally made this request in a note to the list on 18 August:
>>
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/DhG25zCOF4RoR5TukZIg_CLzjrU/
>>
>> The request might have been lost or missed given the different subject on 
>> that message, so I'll make the request explicit with this note. I believe 
>> this document is ready for WG last call and I am asking our chairs to start 
>> the process.
>>
>
> I agree, let’s start this process and get this document out to RFC. This 
> document is key for multi-parties access to RDAP private data use cases, even 
> if ICANN is not mandating it.
>
> Marc.
>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> regext mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to