+1 to Thomas’ question… would be good to know if this is really existing in the wild.
This kind of implementation inconsistency doesn’t really help anyone. Rick From: regext <[email protected]> on behalf of Thomas Corte (TANGO support) <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:13 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [EPP] Several commands under the same <epp> CAUTION: This email came from outside your organization. Don’t trust emails, links, or attachments from senders that seem suspicious or you are not expecting. Hello, On 10/20/22 12:06, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > ... > and that "it works with all the other registries". I'd be curious to know which registries are actually supporting this, and how they deal with issues such as * what response to generate if the various commands demand different responses (e.g., when an <info> is sent along with a <check> or a <poll>) * what response to generate in case of partial success (e.g. if the <create> succeeds but the <update> does not) * how to decide which of the commands the <extension> elements below them should apply to Best regards, Thomas -- TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH Thomas Corte Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222 Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 D-44227 Dortmund E-Mail: [email protected] Germany _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/GgjoCzpyrXSGgL1sXBa9j?domain=ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
