Tom pointed out to me you said WGLC not RFCED. If its in WGLC I think you can make this change as it's obvious, and should be resolved before it exits WGLC
-G On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:39 AM George Michaelson <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's the right thing to do. You should definitely ask the RFC editor > to modify this. > > -G > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:52 AM Mario Loffredo > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I apologize but I just realized that I put an Informational RFC, namely > > 6973, among the Normative References. > > > > Since the doment is still in WGLC, I would like to know if you agree on > > moving that reference to the Information References. > > > > Looking forward to your input to correct the document and publish a new > > version. > > > > > > Best, > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Mario Loffredo > > Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” > > Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) > > National Research Council (CNR) > > via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy > > Phone: +39.0503153497 > > Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > regext mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
