> On Dec 2, 2022, at 1:49 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]> wrote: > I lean towards "prohibited means prohibited". DNS service providers can be > compromised, too, and I'd prefer to see steps taken to explicitly remove the > state prior to a DNS update vs. allowing some actors to bypass the state.
Exactly. I agree wholeheartedly. The point of belt-and-suspenders is to have
a safety mechanism in case _either_ part fails. There’s no reason to go to the
work for only half the value.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
