Response in-line.

On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 4:41 AM Mario Loffredo
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> this new version is complaint with last JSContact spec. I also added a 
> section about registering the JSContact map keys that must be used in the 
> RDAP context.
>
> Since JSContact will hopefully move to IESG next week, I would like to 
> finalize this document for WGLC.
>
> in addition to your remarks, there are some open points from my side:
>
> 1)  The "uid" property is mandatory in JSContact. Currently, the document 
> recommends to set it to the handle value.
>
> As such, currently the value doesn't represent a universal identifier.
>
> To save it from collisions,  a possible solution could be to set it to the 
> URL of the lookup query for the entity related to the contact card as in the 
> following:
>
>
> "handle": "XXXX",
>
> "jscard": {
>
>   "@type" : "Card",
>
>   "@version" : "1.0",
>
>   "uid" : "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX";,
>
> ....
>
> }
>
> The entity lookup URL MUST always be used regardless of the query generating 
> the response including the contact card.
>
> Does it work for you?

JSContact says that it SHOULD be a URN in the uuid space and MAY be a
URI. Why deviate from that? Can it not be a URN in the UUID namespace?

>
>
> 2) This is connected to the point above.
>
> Usually, the handle is not redacted.
>
> Nevertheless, should I add text stating that, being uid mandatory, it MUST be 
> redacted by the emptyValue redaction method as defined in 
> draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted ?

That seems to work, but should this go in the redacted draft instead of here?

>
>
> 3) SInce the contact information as described in RFC5733 doesn't include a 
> separate property for the postal address street details, should I add text 
> clarifying that in the RDAP context the JSContact StreetComponent type "name" 
> is used to
>
> represent all the street details ?
>
> Optionally, it would be possible to register and then use a new 
> StreetComponent type value.

This is cleaner and probably a better choice.


-andy

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to