Hello Mario, Pawel, Thanks for eliciting the rationale behind the proposed discovery and IANA registration of reverse search properties. I defer to the majority view that the benefits outweigh the implementation cost. We can proceed with the WGLC. :)
Regards, Jasdip From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 4:50 AM To: Jasdip Singh <jasd...@arin.net>, Antoin Verschuren <ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search Hi Jasdip, seems to me that the majority was so much in favor of both the help response extension and the ad-hoc IANA registry that the we have been discussing about their structure for some days and two versions were published. Anyway, I do believe that the help extension is appropriate in this case and seems to me in line with the current WG trend (see other ongoing documents such as rdap-openid and rdap-versioning) to provide clients with guidance about both pre-defined and custom optional features a server supports. Furthermore, the additonal implementation effort needed in this case to extend the help response is worthwhile if compared to the benefit. Finally, looking back to the past, this is not the first time we address the discovery topic; we have already accomplished it in other RFCs (i.e. 8977 and 8982), though as a recommendation and according to a different approach. With hindsight, think it could be useful to follow always the same way whereas it makes sense in the future and, in the event of bis-versions, to review the existing RFCs accordingly. Similar considerations can be made with regard to the usage of an ad-hoc IANA registry. Have already said that I don't prefer to use centralized registries but I don't strongly object to them. So if, as it seems to be emerged from the discussion, there is a prevailing opinion that an IANA registry about the reverse search prioperties improves the interoperability, I agree. Best, Mario Il 19/12/2022 16:18, Jasdip Singh ha scritto: Hi. Per the comments in [1], it would be good to settle if the proposed discovery and IANA registration of reverse search properties is an overkill or not. Specifically: 1. Is the newly proposed "reverse_search_properties" member in the help response (section 5) needed? 2. Is the newly proposed "RDAP Reverse Search Properties" registry (section 9.2) needed? Thanks, Jasdip [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/baN_jHO32rRLTbzef6B5Rtep29g/ From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org><mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Antoin Verschuren <ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org><mailto:ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Monday, December 19, 2022 at 10:04 AM To: "regext@ietf.org"<mailto:regext@ietf.org> <regext@ietf.org><mailto:regext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the document shepherd can confirm there are no new changes to be expected during WGLC? Once we have confirmation, we will issue a 3th WGLC when the document is stable. Regards, Jim and Antoin Op 1 dec. 2022, om 14:24 heeft Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it<mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> het volgende geschreven: Hi Chairs, this is to inform you that I'm ready to submit the new rdap-reverse-search version addressing the feedback provided during the LC, i.e. reverse searech properties discovery and registration. Hopefully, no futher feedback will be provided. Would like to know how to proceed now. Should I ask for a new WGLC? Will you do that? Best, Mario -- Dott. Mario Loffredo Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext -- Dott. Mario Loffredo Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
