On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:57 PM Hollenbeck, Scott
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So, questions for the working group:
>
> Is this a topic we should address?

Yes!

>
> If we want to address it, how? New I-D as I suggested above? 5731 erratum? 
> Re-open 5731 and add text (this one is definitely NOT my preference)? 
> Something else?

I'm supportive of the BCP route, if allowable by IETF process.

-andy

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to