Hi all, Please look at this document. It contains a "straw man" implementation of a syntax for supporting TTLs for different record types.
I do not personally like this syntax but have struggled to find one that both (a) seems intuitive and (b) can be fully validated using only the XML schema: the *easy* approach would be to have looser XML schema and then use MUSTs and MUST NOTs in the text, but I'd like to avoid that if I can. So, I am asking for suggestions on how to do it better. I would be very sad if the current model ended up being the final one! G. On 10/09/2023, 14:00, internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Gavin Brown and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl Revision: 02 Title: Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values Date: 2023-09-05 Group: regext Pages: 18 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/ HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02 Abstract: This document describes an extension to the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) that allows EPP clients to manage the Time-To-Live (TTL) value for domain name delegation records. About this draft This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. The source for this draft, and an issue tracker, may can be found at https://github.com/gbxyz/epp-ttl-extension. The IETF Secretariat -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, GDS Technical Services Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
