Hi Maarten,

Unfortunately, our agenda for IETF 118 is already fully booked with no space to 
overrun.
Perhaps we should consider a 2 hour meeting request for next IETF 119.

Regards,

Antoin

> Op 16 okt. 2023, om 17:52 heeft Maarten Wullink 
> <maarten.wullink=40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi Antoin,
> 
> Maybe a bit late, but would it be possible to add a few minutes for a 
> discussion about the usefulness of REST enabled EPP.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Maarten
> 
> 
> see below for my motivation from a mail to the list last week:
> 
> 
> Seeing that more and more registries are moving their infrastructure into the 
> cloud, it might be a good time to take look again at the transport used for 
> EPP.
> Adding a method for easily running EPP services in the cloud could make 
> things easier for registries and registrars.
> 
> some of the advantages i see are:
> 
> - scaling epp services will be easier, run many stateless epp services 
> - rate limiting HTTP is easy compared to EPP TCP session and can use standard 
> tooling for this
> - more in line with modern web development (restful APIs)
> - good support for monitoring of http based services
> 
> 11 years ago we proposed to add a restful transport option (see url to draft 
> below), at the time it got no traction but things haven changed quiet a bit 
> since then, is this something worthy of our time to look into again?
> 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wullink-restful-epp-00
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to