Hi Jody,

Is this a client or a server?

G.

> On 23 Jul 2024, at 02:39, Jody Kolker <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I asked one of our developers at GoDaddy to implement the Redacted RFC with 
> the changes that were included in the Errata.  He was able to implement the 
> RFC with the proposed redaction as GoDaddy would be using it with redaction 
> by empty value and redaction by replacement in under two hours.  He stated 
> that GoDaddy's case is pretty simple and the RFC was straightforward to 
> implement.
> 
> Has anyone else tried to implement the RFC with the additional Errata?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jody Kolker
> 319-329-9805  (mobile)
> 
> Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney ([email protected]) 
> with any feedback.
> 
> This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the 
> addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you 
> have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and 
> permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its 
> attachments.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 5:26 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Jody Kolker 
> <[email protected]>; Roger Carney <[email protected]>; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [regext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9537 (8006)
> 
> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or 
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
> safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.
> 
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9537, "Redacted Fields 
> in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8006__;!!PtGJab4!6kcSluu7t6_Chf4zBEr34eQhrGn6r-Mxlgy8PCFNfMjU70rORX1usE8345BLmzXVtqi1CWjDteIi1poigzrYIdpgLjp3rTd0gGH1Wq4e$
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: James Gould <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 4.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The "postPath" member MUST be set when the redacted field does exist in the 
> redacted response for the Redaction by Empty Value Method (Section 3.2), the 
> Redaction by Partial Value Method (Section 3.3), and the Redaction by 
> Replacement Value Method (Section 3.4).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The "postPath" member MAY be set when the redacted field does exist in the 
> redacted response for the Redaction by Empty Value Method (Section 3.2), the 
> Redaction by Partial Value Method (Section 3.3), and the Redaction by 
> Replacement Value Method (Section 3.4).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "postPath" member is an OPTIONAL member and this MUST can provide 
> confusion.  The intent of this sentence was to outline which of the path 
> members ("prePath", "postPath", and "replacementPath") to use when using path 
> expressions and not to conflict with the OPTIONAL definition.  All of the 
> path expression members are defined as OPTIONAL in the RFC, so this MUST 
> needs be changed to a MAY to correct the confusion.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be 
> removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to 
> discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is 
> reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the 
> report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9537 (draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access 
> Protocol (RDAP) Response
> Publication Date    : March 2024
> Author(s)           : J. Gould, D. Smith, J. Kolker, R. Carney
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Registration Protocols Extensions
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

--
Gavin Brown
Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

https://www.icann.org

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to