Hi Andy,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024, at 10:22 PM, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote:
> I like the idea too, but...
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:58 AM Mario Loffredo
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > A machine-readable central IANA registry is simpler to process than if
> > protocols define their JSContact profiles in an ad-hoc specification. This
> > for example benefits implementors of general-use JSContact libraries.
>
> What does this mean?
I meant to outline the benefit of being able to download JSContact profile
definitions in CSV format from the IANA website, rather than having to distill
the supported properties per profile from reading RFC documents. This should
reduce the effort to implement validating and supporting multiple JSContact
profiles.
Regards,
Robert
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
