Hi Éric,
Thanks for your review and feedback.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 03:12:12AM -0700, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> ### Section 3.1
>
> In `rirSearch1`, I guess that the 1 is for a version. It is a little
> inconsistent with the use of "_0" or "_1" in the relevant IANA registry,
> moreover other extensions defined in this I-D do not have such versionning.
> Thus is just puzzling (possibly based on implementations versions).
We've added some explanatory text for this:
The "1" in "rirSearch1" denotes that this is version 1 of the RIR
search extension. New versions of the RIR search extension will
use different extension identifiers. A version suffix is not used
for the remaining identifiers defined by this document, partly
because such a suffix would reduce consistency with the
corresponding functionality for the other object classes, and
partly because it is very unlikely that the functionality
associated with those identifiers will change.
Regarding the underscore,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions/ is
an attempt to make this space more consistent, and it directs that
underscores not be used in new extension identifiers.
-Tom
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
