Hi Roman,
Thanks for your review and feedback.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> ** Section 9
> Implementations SHOULD also refer to [RFC8446] and
> [BCP195] for additional details.
>
> What does it mean to for implementers “SHOULD also refer to …”?
> What if they don’t? Does “refer” suggest any action? Practically, I
> don’t think the “SHOULD keyword” is well suited here. When should
> BCP195 advice be ignored?
Thanks, updated to:
[RFC7481] describes security requirements and considerations for
RDAP generally. Additionally, guidance as to the use of TLS has
changed since that document was published: see [RFC8446] and
[BCP195] for further detail.
-Tom
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
