Thanks James,
Let’s do it, there’s certainly interest on my side to get both done.
Maarten can you guide us on what would be needed?
Thank you
On 15 Aug 2025, at 11:50, Gould, James wrote:
We posted the IDN Table Mapping draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gould-idn-table) that
provided the ability to:
1. Validate the IDN Domain Name meets the server IDN policy
2. Get IDN tables matching the IDN domain name along with meta-data
3. Cache IDN table code points, where the client can query for a
complete list of IDN tables and the IDN table meta-data from the
server to support pre-validation.
4. Get the IDN Table Identifier to pass with the domain create
command via the idnmap extension if required.
If there is interest in standardizing the idnmap, the idn-table draft
should go along with it. These are independent to the support for IDN
variant relationship management via the Related Domain, Strict
Bundling, and Domain Variant extensions.
Thanks,
--
JG
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email protected]
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email protected]>
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
On 8/15/25, 11:31 AM, "Francisco Obispo" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Hi Maarten,
James Gould and I had a discussion a while back to add some mechanism
to automatically return the IDN tables that matched on a domain check,
then we went on our lives and we never completed this. We have a good
idea of what that would take, and if there is interest in doing this
we can update the draft to add this functionality. Otherwise we could
also go and submitted as is.
Best,
On 14 Aug 2025, at 9:57, Maarten Wullink wrote:
Hi Francisco,
As one of the authors, can you maybe elaborate a bit on why this
document never reached RFC status?
Would you mind if I or somebody else continues this document with the
goal of getting it published as an RFC?
Best,
Maarten
Op 13 aug 2025, om 15:57 heeft Francisco Obispo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende geschreven:
Hi Marteen,
Tucows Registry Services (TRS) is actively using it.
Best,
On 13 Aug 2025, at 8:33, Maarten Wullink wrote:
Hi,
Has any other registry implemented the idnmap [1] extension?
It’s currently only an expired draft, but we use it and are
considering pushing it toward RFC status.
Knowing of other deployments would help make the case.
-
Maarten
[1]
https://secure-web.cisco.com/11tGsfrogM-RPuKFSkTvzNHW6ANB7jQph2ylHTR6a98ZB3DLNMKSfjSHHgQbDJiI9QeyteI3JMKPemqcLF_7GT43iFmceyTsRIaJQboOdVG4TiYcsf90mIxdBI5BnCGMvmhC5eHvLpTgWtHAjH1gNKv8o5uwYd_YtUpdA_ctkt9K76YLH_6JtfpR1gdOMAfZiceZBcgYV1FzwOdiswd2of1GYANzM5zkV-6_zNdWkodosQm6kuYvDXxKAqGX8CxiSgXB6YmUYNlp2KoElIh4g72vIbC7qh2hBNfZSBjiwuyo/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-02
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/11tGsfrogM-RPuKFSkTvzNHW6ANB7jQph2ylHTR6a98ZB3DLNMKSfjSHHgQbDJiI9QeyteI3JMKPemqcLF_7GT43iFmceyTsRIaJQboOdVG4TiYcsf90mIxdBI5BnCGMvmhC5eHvLpTgWtHAjH1gNKv8o5uwYd_YtUpdA_ctkt9K76YLH_6JtfpR1gdOMAfZiceZBcgYV1FzwOdiswd2of1GYANzM5zkV-6_zNdWkodosQm6kuYvDXxKAqGX8CxiSgXB6YmUYNlp2KoElIh4g72vIbC7qh2hBNfZSBjiwuyo/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-02>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
