Ok, thanks

A
Le lun. 1 sept. 2025 à 11:40 AM, Gavin Brown <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Hi Adam,
>
> > On 29 Aug 2025, at 21:31, Adam Guyot <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> > I'm +1 for this, I think it's a great idea.
> > However, below is my best attempt to argue the other side of this.
> > Mind you, I'm not actually sure this is a good argument against but
> > I'm trying to come up with something.
> >
> >  1. Let's say I'm a registry operator, and I receive a HEAD request
> > for example.com
> >  2. I return the Link headers, but since I'm the authoritative
> > registry for .com, I'm essentially saying "yeah, I have this data"
> >  3. Client Behavior: The client then makes a GET request to retrieve
> > the full record
> >  4. Result: I've now handled 2 requests instead of 1, doubling my
> > connection overhead
>
> That's not the scenario. The second HTTP request goes to the *registrar*.
>
> G.
>
> --
> Gavin Brown
> Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> https://www.icann.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to