Jim,

There are two aspects to consider when it comes to the IDN extensions, which is 
support for IDN registrations that would be handled via the IDN mapping / IDN 
language tag with support of the IDN table draft and IDN relationships that 
could be supported via the Strict Bundling, the Related Domain, and the new 
Variants draft.  

-- 

JG 



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com 
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> 




On 9/8/25, 10:24 AM, "James Galvin" <gal...@elistx.com 
<mailto:gal...@elistx.com>> wrote:


Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe. 


Speaking as a participant, I’d like to ask for time on the agenda to discuss 
the following document:


https://secure-web.cisco.com/18rEXrAnQ1ju50q6MzGLNF7emv0h3WV3VknEs_rsHimRfkKnEFuxS8Ky103ZsgK1Fg2i9_kucLiMXRHnOQfIz5gERIJ_W0Clt11FZUsNV3_K1nFDpFQ7JHCa1fwJsmVpmbupixOXMeRGtMTMCEpXrbFP0HgTwlJVX913GDAeF7EAhPdrYt87ixIdacS745SpFS7cM1keQVzt6VfXX-0P6z5X2iVSx-ynchX3h5Extwx-2pH8cAB3A8QT1KDP5b8NsKLC8ZWdLyAHZBEbkPTgplm2fzkjRPCd7k93eG8AVqLznCocf7sKsYNlpBxDhK-5a/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-galvin-regext-epp-variants%2F
 
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/18rEXrAnQ1ju50q6MzGLNF7emv0h3WV3VknEs_rsHimRfkKnEFuxS8Ky103ZsgK1Fg2i9_kucLiMXRHnOQfIz5gERIJ_W0Clt11FZUsNV3_K1nFDpFQ7JHCa1fwJsmVpmbupixOXMeRGtMTMCEpXrbFP0HgTwlJVX913GDAeF7EAhPdrYt87ixIdacS745SpFS7cM1keQVzt6VfXX-0P6z5X2iVSx-ynchX3h5Extwx-2pH8cAB3A8QT1KDP5b8NsKLC8ZWdLyAHZBEbkPTgplm2fzkjRPCd7k93eG8AVqLznCocf7sKsYNlpBxDhK-5a/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-galvin-regext-epp-variants%2F>


Recall from IETF123 the authors did indicate that they will be asking the 
working group to consider adopting this work, which we will do before IETF124. 
The authors are working through one material update to the document, which is 
to move from presenting the proposal in the context of IDN Variants to 
presenting the proposal in the context of related groups. Recall that this is 
being done so that the proposal will also support at least Latin diacritics and 
not just IDN variants. As soon as this work is done we will put the document 
forward the working group and then we will use time at IETF124 to continue 
discussions to advance the work.


Probably at least 20 minutes is appropriate.


Thanks,


Jim




On 25 Aug 2025, at 6:18, Antoin Verschuren wrote:


> Dear Working Group,
>
> It is time to start thinking about IETF 124 in Montreal.
> Working Group scheduling is due in 3 weeks.
> Since last IETF 123 we were short in time due to last minute requests, and we 
> had to cancel a meeting for IETF 122, we want to make sure we will request 
> enough time to accommodate all this time.
> So if you are planning to present anything in Montreal, both on-site or 
> remote, or request any other time on our agenda, please let us know before 
> September 14th so we can schedule accordingly.
> No need for abstracts or presentations yet, just reply to this message to 
> indicate plans.
>
> Regards,
>
> Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim, Jorge and Antoin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org 
> <mailto:regext-le...@ietf.org>


_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org 
<mailto:regext-le...@ietf.org>



_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to