On 10/16/25 02:27, Pawel Kowalik wrote:
The question was referring to the collision/registration scenario. Should it be allowed that: version 0 registers foo and foov0 version 1 registers foov1 If yes, collision rules defined in 2.2 need to be fine tuned to account for such versioning scenario, e.g. by saying that in case of versions of the same extensions collisions are allowed, or by disallowing collisions even on the level of the same extension - means that version 0 would not be allowed to register foov1 and foo and would need to register foov1 and bar instead. foov2 won't be in conflict with any of them in this case.
These are opaque identifiers. There is no inherent connection between them, therefore the normal collision rules apply. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
