Yes, that makes sense. Thanks everyone! Expect a new version of the draft shortly.
> On 14 Nov 2025, at 15:48, Andy Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 14-11-2025 10:01 AM, Gavin Brown wrote: >> Since it was you who originally suggested the array model, a more >> interesting question is has *your* mind changed? ;) >> FWIW, I think Pavel's point about what's best for "simple" clients is pretty >> compelling. > > Yes, it is a good argument. If you are good with it, so am I. To help those > implementers using object mapping frameworks, I think the draft should point > out as advice the RR types that are most likely to be used in RDAP, that way > they don't have to do every RR type. Does that work? > > -andy -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
