Hi Jim,This is related to the discussion https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/4ltuAgyJlFvJ-FxvZDDz-8UHMKs/ on what extension draft should be telling about versions and where a clear cut to other specification (versioning draft) should be drawn.
Kind regards, Pawel On 17.11.25 18:08, James Galvin wrote:
It’s possible the Chairs misunderstood. We believe the versioning document is its own document and will be progressed separately as soon as this one moves along. If that’s not correct would folks please elaborate in this thread. Thanks, Jim On 17 Nov 2025, at 10:58, Pawel Kowalik wrote:Hi, I have a question to the chairs. The discussion in the IETF 124 session was clear I suppose, that this draft has still open issues (related to versioning and successor extensions), that the editors planned to put into a new version, which would be material. What is the point of WGLC on -08 now? PS: meeting notes seem not to reflect that, but the recording does [1]. [1] https://youtu.be/amU-svL77eY?si=mqRC5O0zpCiwKpxE&t=711 Kind Regards, Pawel On 17.11.25 16:14, James Galvin via Datatracker wrote:Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-08 (Ends 2025-12-01) This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document. Abstract: This document describes and clarifies the usage of extensions in RDAP. File can be retrieved from: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions/ Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected] in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are highly appreciated. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
