parsing out several statements here...
On 1/19/26 11:27 AM, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> -Is registration of XML namespaces also required for proprietary extensions
> when they apply for EPP extension registry registrations? The texts is now
> not clear
How is it unclear? The text offered below says that I-Ds are exempt from
registration. If it is unclear, can you offer text that you believe to be more
clear?
> , and registration of XML schema and namespaces might be a hurdle to register
> a proprietary extension.
How? It is a request to the IANA. How is that burdensome?
> (Remember the goal of the registry is to identify proprietary extensions to
> harmonise into standard extensions even when they use incompliant namespaces)
If that is the goal, it could be accomplished on the wg's wikipedia page. No
need to burden IANA.
However, RFC 8126 says interoperability is the goal:
To ensure that the values
in these fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote
interoperability, their allocations are often coordinated by a
central record keeper.
Furthermore, required Specification Required:
In addition to the
normal review of such a request, the designated expert will review
the public specification and evaluate whether it is sufficiently
stable and permanent, and sufficiently clear and technically sound to
allow interoperable implementations.
Allowing colliding namespace identifiers is not technically sound. Or do you
believe otherwise?
> -Are informational RFCs allowed to use IETF namespaces?
If you are asking about the XML registry, I believe they are allowed.
-andy, as an individual
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
