Hi,

As far as I can now notice, the document now does not change XML namespace. This is IMHO a good choice.

In this form I support adoption with the small scope without any added functionality.

Kind Regards,
Pawel

On 04.05.26 12:55, James Galvin wrote:
Folks,

IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ AND RESPOND IF APPROPRIATE FOR YOU.


Strictly speaking, based on the fact that no one outside of the authors have 
indicated support for adopting this document, the adoption of this document 
should be rejected.  However, this working group often makes exceptions, in 
large part because the number of working group members who are active is quite 
small compared to the typical IETF working group.  In this case, the authors 
are all active participants, leaving extremely few others to express an opinion.

So here’s the exception.

The Chairs would suggest this document be adopted.  Although we do not 
ordinarily base our decisions only on document author preferences, this is an 
update to an existing standard that should progress, in our opinion of course.  
If we adopt this document the working group will still have a decision point at 
which it can reject or revise these changes.

Since this is an exception, we have not changed the status of the document just 
yet.  While we will consider this document adopted, we are going to allow an 
additional week for any working group member to object this decision.  If 
anyone objects, then this document will not be adopted and will revert to 
remaining on the list of “Candidate for Working Group Adoption”.  The Chairs 
will work with the authors to consider the best path forward at that time.

If no one objects during this week, the document status will change on 11 May 
2026 and the Chairs will ask the authors to submit a draft named for the 
working group.

The opportunity to object to the adoption of this draft, closes on Monday, 11 
May 2026.

Please reply to the list if you want to object and please indicate why you do 
not believe we should adopt this document.

Thanks,

Jim, Antoin, Jorge


On 20 Apr 2026, at 15:33, James Galvin via Datatracker wrote:

This message starts a regext WG Call for Adoption of:
draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis-02

This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-05-04

Abstract:
    This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
    [RFC5730] extension mapping for the management of Domain Name System
    (DNS) domain names subject to "grace period" policies.  Grace period
    policies exist to allow protocol actions to be reversed or otherwise
    revoked during a short period of time after the protocol action has
    been performed.  This mapping extends the EPP domain name mapping
    [RFC5731] to provide additional features required for grace period
    processing.

    This document replaces the extension mapping for grace periods
    described in [RFC3915], rendering that document obsolete.

Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption
of this Internet-Draft by the regext WG. Comments to explain your preference
are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and
include this message in your response.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].

Thank you.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis-02
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to