Hi Gavin, Thanks for your quick response. I would suggest that you post an update quickly to avoid other ADs picking up the same points (some may get filed as DISCUSS).
Thanks, Ketan On Thu, 14 May, 2026, 1:40 pm Gavin Brown, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ketan, > > Thanks for your review. My comments are below. > > > On 14 May 2026, at 12:33 pm, Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > 1) Section 4.2 says "As a result, RDAP clients which use these > frameworks may > > SHOULD explicitly carve out the "values" property of "ttl0_data" > elements." ... > > I am guessing this is just a "SHOULD" and not a "may SHOULD" ? > > This was already picked up by Med, and will be fixed in the next version. > > > 2) RFC9499 perhaps needs to be a normative reference since it describes > the TTL > > term that is used in the context of this document? I don't know enough > of the > > provenance of DNS documents and terminologies and hence providing as a > comment > > for the authors/WG and others to consider. > > I'm happy to make this change. > > G. > > -- > Gavin Brown > Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > https://www.icann.org > >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
