Charles Eckel has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support the DISCUSS from Mahesh. Regarding the considerations for the DE, I have a few additional comments. Section 2.2.1. Required Information "Name of Extension: A case-insensitive, ASCII text string that contains the name of the extension specification and does not overlap with an existing registered extension." Should checking that this requirement is met be added to the instructions to the DE? _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
