Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke INT AD comments for draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic-10 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. Special thanks to Med Boucadair, the responsible AD, to point me to the last paragraph of section 7 (which could use a MUST though) to handle my previously [DISCUSS ballot](https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/4zJiC7I3GlGPdjPuVqXi5smwYpQ/) Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points/nits (replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric Note: this ballot comments follow the Markdown syntax of https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/tree/main, i.e., they can be processed by a tool to create github issues. ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Gorry's DISCUSS I second Gorry's DISCUSS issues as they are sensible ### Why QUIC in Section 1 I failed to find why using QUIC is useful, especially with `EPP sessions use a single QUIC stream for all command and response exchanges` especially when reading section 3 `This means that a single QUIC connection may support multiple EoQ sessions.` The introduction should probably state that there could be several EPP sessions (for different domains ?) over a single QUIC connection. ### Section 3 `As shown in Figure 1 in Section 4,` it is painful for the reader to scroll down. Suggest moving the figure in section 3. s/on a well-known UDP port number assigned by IANA/on *the* well-known UDP port number assigned by IANA/ (if there is only one) ### Section 4 Why not a "MUST" in `Absent local policy, a server SHOULD end an EoQ session and close the QUIC stream if a well-formed command is not received within the time limit` ? Also note https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/ (and thanks for the guidance provided for previous "SHOULD") ### Section 5 s/The 32 bits total length/The *32-bit* total length/ ### Use of SVG graphics To make a much nicer HTML rendering, suggest using the aasvg tool to generate SVG graphics. It is worth a try especially if the I-D uses the Kramdown file format ;-) _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
