Christopher Inacio has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Mike O. for the SECDIR review. Thanks for the well written draft. * Please consider protections against excessively long messages as noted in Mike's SECDIR review. * Is a “MUST” with an “unless” really a MUST? Section 3 ¶2: `By default, an EPP server MUST listen for QUIC connection requests on a well-known UDP port number assigned by IANA (see Section 9.2), unless there is a mutual agreement to use another port number.` * I will echo the comment of other ADs - I'm not sure what the support of multiple QUIC streams does or why its useful; parallel processing on the EPP server maybe? * Most of my other comments are already covered by other ADs. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
