Dear Authors and all, I have reviewed draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rpki and would like to offer a suggestion for your consideration.
Publication repositories are an important component of the RPKI infrastructure. Operational or availability issues with a repository can affect RPKI data synchronization and, consequently, the information derived from RPKI. Therefore, being able to identify and contact the organization operating a publication repository can be useful for troubleshooting. As I understand it, the document associates RPKI objects with entities and also provides publicationUri, notificationUri, and rpkiType. However, the CA and the publication repository are not necessarily operated by the same organization. In such cases, it seems that the current model does not explicitly identify the organization operating the publication repository or provide its contact information. Would it be useful to consider representing both the CA operator and the publication repository operator when they are different entities? For example, the associated entities could have different roles to distinguish the CA operator from the repository operator. Best, Lancheng _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
