> Hi Deepal!
>
> Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
>>> The important thing seems to me to decide exactly what you get if you
>>> do a registry.get("/foo;comments"). I would think you'd get a
>>> collection Resource which contains the comments as individual Atom
>>> entries.
>> In this case the return type is Resource and that resource contains
>> links to the comments
>>> On the wire, this is EXACTLY the same as when you do
>>> registry.getComments("/foo").
>> In this case the return type is set of comment objects.
>
> What I'm saying is that there should be absolutely no difference at
> the protocol level. Both of these calls should generate
There is a difference , the difference is in one case we call
registry.get whereas in other we call registry.getComments and the
results are two different. And I can implement this if that is only for
comments , but the same thing is there for tags, versions as well.
The problem is this , when we call "get" method what we get is Resource
with its child list having paths , for example if we call "get" method
with "/c1/c2;comments" then the resultant Resource will have child list
that does not have information about the comments. Therefore as I can
see calling "/c1/c2;comments" using "get" API wrong to me , I think that
should be changed to "/c1/c2;commentPaths" since what actually we get is
path , not actual resource.
Or we keep different query parameter for atom (as we have now)
-Deepal
_______________________________________________
Registry-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev
