Is the change big? If not I'd rather get this in .. getting a 401 for a missing resource is not good.
It is not a big change :)
If you think its ok to do the changes then we can merge the changes.

Thanks
Deepal

Sanjiva.

Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:

Chathura/Deepal:

I just checked in a change to trunk which fixes what I think is a major bug. Before this fix if I access a non-existent resource via HTTP, the registry would return a 401 Unauthorized response. In a browser, this would result in a login popup.

After the fix (which is to check resourceExists() in SecureRegistry before checking authorization) we get a 404 as expected.
Great.

I'll leave it to you guys to decide whether or not to merge this to the branch - I think it should be merged in and released with 1.0, so +1 from me.
I too agree since you have done a very good fix , however I am bit worried about doing last minute changes since we have done a number of QA round , and we decided not do last minute changes. So I am 0- on this.

Thanks
Deepal
Please discuss and merge after taking a look if you agree.

I'll be back online in 6 or 7 hours - gotta sleep for a bit!

Thanks,
--Glen

_______________________________________________
Registry-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev




_______________________________________________
Registry-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev





_______________________________________________
Registry-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev

Reply via email to