Is this ready in the build system already ?
Thanks,
Avi
On 8/18/06, Patrice Dumas <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Markus Raab wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 00:04 schrieb Patrice Dumas:
>
> > what about building examples unconditionnaly (that is even if experimental
> > isn't enabled) as part of make check and never install them?
>
> Yeah, if we split tests away from examples we should consider that.
My idea was that being albe to recompile the examples is a test, so that
they could be built as part of
make check
> I saw at elfutils (from redhat) that they have a complete testing framework
> which is run automatically when building it. I think thats a very good idea!
When building, or running make check? I think it is a bad idea to have
tests run automatically, I thin k it is better to follow the make check
convention.
> They also build with -Wall and -Werror, which is not a very good idea, e.g. my
> compiler had an warning which made me fixing the buildscripts not to include
> -Werror;)
That's for that sort of issues that I warn against messing with CFLAGS...
--
Pat
--
my blog: http://avi.alkalay.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Registry-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/registry-list
