Joan Valduvieco Llopart wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> I am willing to continue working on these packages and submit to debian
>>> if someone is interested. I've contacted sfllaw (which is the owner of
>>> ITP #311371) without response.
>>>
>> Submit to debian would be great.
>>
I never even submitted an ITP since elektra was not/is not stable enough
w.r.t. its API.
We can however upload to experimental for the time being }->
I would take care of that :-)
>> Some things I found during testing:
>> Why does libelektra depends on libelektra-utils? It is ok to install only
>> the library.
>>
>
> libelektra-utils contains kdb wich is used in libelektra postinst script in
> order to configre some parameters. I'm no libelektra guru (I am using it's C
> API on a project but I haven't deep knowledge of it).. Is the following
> command necessary for elektra working with filesys backend?
> kdb set
> system/sw/kdb/current/schemapath "/usr/share/sgml/elektra-0.1.1/elektra.xsd"
>
> If it is not necessary I can remove from libelektra postinst script and break
> the dependency
Easier: do include kdb in the libelektra? package, instead of
libelektra-utils.
That way, usage in embedded systems will be easier (less resource
consumption)
There is nothing against including *small, needed* binaries with a
library package.
Regards,
J.L.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Registry-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/registry-list
