Launchpad has imported 16 comments from the remote bug at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4924.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-10-29T09:17:58+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: With fontconfig 2.2.3 my Futura fonts where schown right as: Futura BdCn BT Futura BdCn BT, Italic Futura Bk BT Futura Bk BT, Italic FuturaBlack BT Futura Hv BT Futura Hv BT, Italic Futura Lt BT Futura Lt BT, Italic Futura LtCn BT Futura Md BT Futura Md BT, Bold Futura Md BT, Bold Italic Futura Md BT, Italic Futura MdCn BT Futura XBlk BT Futura XBlkCn BT Futura XBlkCnlt BT Futura XBlklt BT Now with fontconfig 2.3.2 the list is unusable as the font names are as follows: Futura Futura Futura Futura Futura FuturaBlack BT Semi-Expanded Futura Bold Futura Bold Italic Futura Condensed Futura Condensed Futura Condensed Futura Condensed Futura Italic Futura Italic Futura Italic Futura Italic Futura Italic Futura Italic Condensed Futura Italic Condensed Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-03-23T03:22:43+00:00 Gemi-bluewin wrote: I can confirm this on Fedora Core 5. I normally use the Zurich BT family, which is completely collapsed and no longer usable. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-04-16T15:44:48+00:00 Plam wrote: I'm not quite sure how I can address these bugs, seeing as how I don't have access to any of these BT fonts... Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-09-01T11:09:46+00:00 Keith Packard wrote: Can you stick the mis-interpreted font files in a new directory and provide the output of: $ FC_DEBUG=384 fc-cache -f <path-to-new-directory> That should help see where fontconfig is mis-interpreting the data in the fonts. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-09-02T20:19:09+00:00 Keith Packard wrote: At least for Zurich, the variants are correctly listed in the style field, and Gnome applications appear to be able to select the variants correctly using the font selection dialog. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-05T06:41:15+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: Created an attachment (id=7656) FC_DEBUG=384 fc-cache -f This is the FC_DEBUG=384 fc-cache -f procedure for my Futura (and other) fonts that still do not work. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-05T06:42:17+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: This bug is still valid for my Futura fonts. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-05T12:36:12+00:00 Keith Packard wrote: I don't understand what you expect to see; fontconfig is correctly extracting both listed family names (futura and, e.g., futura lt BT). Either name should get matched. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-08T02:32:12+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: Created an attachment (id=7702) right looking list of futura fonts Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-08T02:32:57+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: Created an attachment (id=7703) wrong looking list of futura fonts Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-08T02:36:00+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: (In reply to comment #7) > I don't understand what you expect to see; fontconfig is correctly extracting > both listed family names (futura and, e.g., futura lt BT). Either name should > get matched. > In the attachments I created you can see that with the current version of fontconfig font names oviously look wrong. The attachment where the names look right was created with fontconfig 2.2.3 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-08T08:34:12+00:00 Keith Packard wrote: Fontconfig is correctly reporting the names present in the font file, and the application is failing to select the one you want to see. You can either fix the application or adjust the names presented by fontconfig by reconfiguring fontconfig using the new <match target="scan"> element. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-11-08T09:31:38+00:00 Bugzilla-mbachert wrote: May I add that all applications using fontconfig display a wrong list. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-16T05:55:49+00:00 Mfabian-suse wrote: Recently, fontconfig seems to list the two different family names in the Futura fonts in different order than before: openSUSE 10.2 with original fontconfig as distributed with openSUSE 10.2: mfab...@baker:~$ cat /etc/SuSE-release openSUSE 10.2 (i586) VERSION = 10.2 mfab...@baker:~$ rpm -q fontconfig fontconfig-2.4.1-19 mfab...@baker:~$ fc-list Futura Futura,Futura Hv BT:style=Heavy Italic Futura,Futura BdCn BT:style=Bold Futura:style=Condensed Medium Futura,Futura Md BT:style=Bold Italic Futura:style=Condensed ExtraBold Futura,Futura Bk BT:style=Book Italic Futura,Futura XBlkCnIt BT:style=Extra Black Italic Futura:style=Medium Italic Futura,Futura Lt BT:style=Light Italic Futura,Futura LtCn BT:style=Light Futura,Futura Md BT:style=Medium Italic mfab...@baker:~$ openSUSE 10.2 with fontconfig updated from http://software.opensuse.org/download/M17N/openSUSE_10.2/ m...@nozomi:~$ cat /etc/SuSE-release openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) VERSION = 10.2 m...@nozomi:~$ rpm -q fontconfig fontconfig-2.4.2-15.1 m...@nozomi:~$ fc-list Futura Futura Hv BT,Futura:style=Heavy Italic Futura BdCn BT,Futura:style=Bold Futura:style=Condensed Medium Futura Md BT,Futura:style=Bold Italic Futura:style=Condensed ExtraBold Futura Bk BT,Futura:style=Book Italic Futura XBlkCnIt BT,Futura:style=Extra Black Italic Futura:style=Medium Italic Futura Lt BT,Futura:style=Light Italic Futura LtCn BT,Futura:style=Light Futura Md BT,Futura:style=Medium Italic m...@nozomi:~$ I.e. between fontconfig 2.4.1 and fontconfig 2.4.2, the order of the listing of the two family names has changed. Matthias Bachert <[email protected]> reported that this solved his problem, see also http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218246 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T08:11:01+00:00 Freedesktop wrote: Keith, anything to fix here? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T11:50:06+00:00 Keith Packard wrote: It looks like the name reordering in 2.4.2 solved this problem; I'm going to mark it as fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/24764/comments/18 ** Changed in: fontconfig Importance: Unknown => Critical ** Bug watch added: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #218246 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218246 -- Wrong font names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24764 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry Administrators, which is the registrant for Fontconfig. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~registry Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~registry More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
