Launchpad has imported 5 comments from the remote bug at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24829.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-31T07:46:16+00:00 Gioele Barabucci wrote: (I originally reported this as «https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600219>) Weird values are reported for the "Read error rate" SMART parameter for my disk Seagate Momentus ST9250315AS with firmware revision 0001SDM1. These values are value: "230874873" (raw 0xf9dec20d0000) normalized value "119" worst value is "100" threshold value is "6" Could these values be sanitised somehow before reporting them? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-disk- utility/+bug/460030/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-31T08:06:09+00:00 Lennart-poettering wrote: What's wrong with that value? Also, please attach the SMART data dump of your drive. You can generate it with 'skdump --save=foo /dev/sda' Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-disk- utility/+bug/460030/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-31T08:10:15+00:00 Gioele Barabucci wrote: Created an attachment (id=30862) Result of skdump --save on my disk Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-disk- utility/+bug/460030/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-31T08:15:49+00:00 Gioele Barabucci wrote: (In reply to comment #1) > What's wrong with that value? I, as a simple user with no knowledge of SMART, think that the read error rate cannot be 230874873 when the threshold value is 6 and the worst value 100. Also if that huge value is real, why are both that parameter and the disk reported as OK? Could the fact that I am on an amd64 system influence the reading or interpretation of that value? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-disk- utility/+bug/460030/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-31T08:22:08+00:00 Lennart-poettering wrote: Nah. That field has no well-known unit or decoding, we simply show the raw unit-less value there. It's not clear if smaller or bigger is better. There's nothing wrong here. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-disk- utility/+bug/460030/comments/5 ** Changed in: libatasmart Importance: Unknown => Medium -- Palimpsest displays out-of-range SMART values https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry Administrators, which is the registrant for gnome-disk-utility. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~registry Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~registry More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
