Launchpad has imported 49 comments from the remote bug at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T02:21:40+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: The problem began here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2007-February/021847.html Today we tested latest xserver (1.2.99.902) and intel driver (1.99.92). Everything starts, the flickering no longer happens but now font size is crazy. Switching back to i810 driver with the same xserver curses problem. Also xrandr shows sometimes that VGA output is connected (while it is not), later for one or two seconds that it's not connected and then again that it's connected. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T02:22:24+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Created an attachment (id=9149) screenshot of broken kdm screen Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T02:22:53+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Created an attachment (id=9150) used xorg.conf Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T02:23:09+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Created an attachment (id=9151) X log Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T02:23:52+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Created an attachment (id=9152) running xrandr serveral times, one run after another shows different results Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T14:02:45+00:00 Eric Anholt wrote: OK, we can get that fixed. Can you provide a physical measurement of your panel size (in mm)? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-15T22:57:32+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: DisplaySize 330 210 # mm these are real values measured manually :) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-03-27T23:31:17+00:00 Przemyslaw-plewa wrote: Still doesn’t work witch xserver (1.2.99.903) and intel driver (1.9.93) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-04-03T02:55:44+00:00 Przemyslaw-plewa wrote: Still doesn’t work with xserver (1.2.99.903) and intel driver (1.9.94) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-04-20T14:10:34+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Unfortunately the problem persist with xserver 1.3.0 and intel driver 2.0.0. Is this issue really so hard? :-) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-05-14T09:31:57+00:00 Jcnengel wrote: *** Bug 10756 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-08-09T14:09:15+00:00 Eric Anholt wrote: Created an attachment (id=11068) proposed fix for physical size detection Could you test the attached patch against a current server? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-08-14T03:21:50+00:00 Przemyslaw-plewa wrote: Unfortunately the problem persist with xserver 1.3.0 and intel driver 2.1.1 with your patch Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-08-23T18:43:20+00:00 Michael Fu wrote: Eric to respond... Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-09T00:14:23+00:00 Hong-liu wrote: Created an attachment (id=11949) patch to ry This patch prefers the user configured DisplaySize to the probed DDC data, please add the actual physical size to your xorg.conf monitor section and have a try. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-09T06:47:53+00:00 agd5f wrote: (In reply to comment #14) > Created an attachment (id=11949) [details] > patch to ry > > This patch prefers the user configured DisplaySize to the probed DDC data, > please add the actual physical size to your xorg.conf monitor section and have > a try. > This patch needs probably go upstream anyway (should go in 1.4.1 as well) as there are often cases when we don't know the physical size of an output and need to specify it. See bug 12474 for example. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-11T05:11:45+00:00 Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen wrote: Created an attachment (id=11987) Xorg.0.log Same problem here on Acer 5022 with Mobility Radeon X700, xserver 1.3.0.0 and latest xf86-video-ati from git Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-11T16:41:59+00:00 agd5f wrote: *** Bug 12784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-11T16:51:30+00:00 Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen wrote: The problem is not caused by the driver, but by bad EDID data from the panel. Bytes 66-67 (image size in mm) are simply copied over from bytes 21-22 (panel size in cm) which is obviously incorrect. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-11T17:01:33+00:00 Eric Anholt wrote: I believe I've fixed the EDID issue upstream now (confused your issue with a very similar one). Please retest. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-11T17:18:35+00:00 agd5f wrote: *** Bug 12581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-12T06:49:33+00:00 Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen wrote: Created an attachment (id=12011) Xorg.0.log The problem still persists, even with the patch from http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/xserver.git;a=commit;h=fc092334ac0a323b80a9602cb8bf60ca9dee3bfa In Xorg.0.log the EDID quirk is mentioned, but xdpyinfo still shows wrong dpi (and fonts are huge) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-12T06:50:41+00:00 Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen wrote: Created an attachment (id=12012) xdpyinfo xdpyinfo output Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-23T17:43:15+00:00 Michael Fu wrote: could anybody post a test result of patch in comment# 14? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-24T03:11:04+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: (In reply to comment #23) > could anybody post a test result of patch in comment# 14? > Yes, i patch this patcg again Archlinux xorg-server 1.4 : # Patches from redhat: patch -Np3 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-redhat-die-ugly-pattern-die-die-die.patch patch -Np0 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-x11-server-0.99.3-init-origins-fix.patch patch -Np1 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-x11-server-1.0.1-Red-Hat-extramodes.patch patch -Np0 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-x11-server-1.1.0-no-move-damage.patch patch -Np1 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-vbe-filter-less.patch patch -Np1 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-no-scanpci.patch patch -Np1 -i ${startdir}/src/xserver-1.3.0-newglx-offscreen-pixmaps.patch # Own patches patch -Np1 -i ${startdir}/src/xorg-server-1.2.0-defaultdpi.patch patch -Np1 -i ${startdir}/src/prefer-displaysize.patch aclocal autoconf automake --add-missing ./configure --prefix=/usr \ --with-mesa-source=${startdir}/src/Mesa-${_mesaver} \ --enable-ipv6 \ --enable-dri \ --enable-dmx \ --enable-xvfb \ --enable-xnest \ --enable-composite \ --enable-xcsecurity \ --enable-xorg \ --enable-xtrap \ --enable-xevie \ --enable-xephyr \ --enable-glx-tls \ --disable-kdrive \ --enable-install-setuid \ --disable-xprint \ --sysconfdir=/etc/X11 \ --localstatedir=/var \ --with-default-font-path=/usr/share/fonts/misc,/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/TTF,/usr/share/fonts/Type1 \ --with-rgb-path=/usr/share/X11/rgb \ --with-xkb-path=/usr/share/X11/xkb \ --with-xkb-output=/usr/share/X11/xkb/compiled \ --with-dri-driver-path=/usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri \ --disable-static make || return 1 make DESTDIR=${startdir}/pkg install || return 1 mkdir -p ${startdir}/pkg/etc/X11 mkdir -p ${startdir}/pkg/var/lib mv ${startdir}/pkg/usr/share/X11/xkb/compiled ${startdir}/pkg/var/lib/xkb ln -sf /var/lib/xkb ${startdir}/pkg/usr/share/X11/xkb/compiled cd ${startdir}/pkg/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions mv libGLcore.so libGLcore.xorg mv libglx.so libglx.xorg # prevent conflict with nvidia-utils mv ${startdir}/pkg/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so \ ${startdir}/pkg/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so.1.4 ------------------------------------------------------------- ARCH x86_64 kernel 2.6.23 dbus 1.1.2 hal 0.5.10 xf86-video-intel 2.1.1 xorg 1.4 GCC 4.2.2 pixman 0.9.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Result: X server not starting, crash! Backtrace: 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x6a) [0x48d0ba] 1: /lib/libc.so.6 [0x2b8cc69517b0] 2: X(xf86RandR12CreateScreenResources+0x1ee) [0x4b2a5e] 3: X [0x4ada9f] 4: X(main+0x319) [0x4367d9] 5: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2b8cc693eae4] 6: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x261) [0x435c79] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting please see Xorg.0.log - DPI is not anyway (96,96) , but (96,154) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-24T03:14:03+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Created an attachment (id=12171) crashed xorg-server 1.4 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-24T03:14:55+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Created an attachment (id=12172) crashed xorg-server 1.4 log crashed xorg-server 1.4 log Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/43 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-24T03:17:06+00:00 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: Confirming. We tested #14 when it appeared but the server crashed. Unfortunately we had no debug symbols compiled in so we weren't able to dig deeper what's the cause. Now I see that the patch was problematic as crash happens for others, too. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-24T10:14:17+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote: Looks like you're not using a monitor section at all or do not specify it properly with Option "Monitor-outputname" "monitorsection" Still it's a bug in the patch of comment #14, since you get a Nullpointer reference when not using a monitor section. This should not happen. I stumbled across this today as well ... Better version of this patch: diff --git a/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86RandR12.c b/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86RandR12.c index 38435c9..135356d 100644 --- a/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86RandR12.c +++ b/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86RandR12.c @@ -426,8 +426,18 @@ xf86RandR12CreateScreenResources (ScreenPtr pScreen) xf86OutputPtr output = config->output[config->compat_output]; xf86CrtcPtr crtc = output->crtc; - if (crtc && crtc->mode.HDisplay && - output->mm_width && output->mm_height) + if (output->conf_monitor && + (output->conf_monitor->mon_width > 0 || + output->conf_monitor->mon_height > 0)) + { + /* + * Prefer user configured DisplaySize + */ + mmWidth = output->conf_monitor->mon_width; + mmHeight = output->conf_monitor->mon_height; + } + else if (crtc && crtc->mode.HDisplay && + output->mm_width && output->mm_height) { /* * If the output has a mode and a declared size, use that Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-24T11:31:45+00:00 Mhopf-suse wrote: I committed a slightly modified version of this patch (a monitor section with either width or height <= 0 shouldn't be honored as well). But I think the original issue is still open. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/46 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T03:22:33+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: (In reply to comment #29) it's a good thing, thanks! Xserver not crashed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I use new add (for my laptop) in xorg.conf for Option "Monitor-outputname" "monitorsection" : Section "Monitor" Identifier "LCD 1280x800" Option "DPMS" "true" VendorName "LPL" DisplaySize 338 211 Option "Monitor-LVDS " "LVDS monitor" EndSection ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Results : xserver 1.4 with "better" patch set display dimensions now right : (**) intel(0): Display dimensions: (338, 211) mm but DPI is set wrong - DPI is now 96,154. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T03:30:19+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Created an attachment (id=12180) better patch - xserver works ( Xorg.0.log) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T06:01:46+00:00 agd5f wrote: (In reply to comment #30) > > Results : xserver 1.4 with "better" patch set display dimensions now right : > (**) intel(0): Display dimensions: (338, 211) mm > > but DPI is set wrong - DPI is now 96,154. > check xdpyinfo. you dpi should be correct. the (**) intel(0): DPI set to (96, 154) line is misleading in that it takes into account the virtual size of the desktop when it prints that. The xrandr code does the right thing however. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T07:47:46+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: (In reply to comment #32) OK, results from xdpyinfo: # xdpyinfo |grep resolution resolution: 112x968 dots per inch the font is huge --------------------------------------------------------- when i use # xrandr --fbmm 338x211 : (338x211 is physical size of my laptop´s display) # xdpyinfo |grep resolution resolution: 96x96 dots per inch the font is correct Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T08:19:44+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote: >Section "Monitor" > Identifier "LCD 1280x800" > Option "DPMS" "true" > VendorName "LPL" > DisplaySize 338 211 > Option "Monitor-LVDS " "LVDS monitor" >EndSection Isn't the monitor Option line just wrong? Shouldn't this be Option "monitor-LVDS " "LCD 1280x800" instead? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T08:32:23+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: (In reply to comment #34) > >Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "LCD 1280x800" > > Option "DPMS" "true" > > VendorName "LPL" > > DisplaySize 338 211 > > Option "Monitor-LVDS " "LVDS monitor" > >EndSection > Isn't the monitor Option line just wrong? Shouldn't this be > > Option "monitor-LVDS " "LCD 1280x800" > > instead? > Yes, right !! I am idiot, sorry. If i use "better" patch + in xorg.conf DisplaySize + Option "Monitor- outputname" "monitorsection" the dpi is correct !! 96dpi, no huge wrong DPI. The problem is fixed. Can another make test for confirmation? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/52 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T08:48:31+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Created an attachment (id=12190) xorg.conf with right set DisplaySize and "Monitor-outputname" "monitorsection" Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/53 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T08:49:39+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Created an attachment (id=12191) xdpyinfo with fixed DPI Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/54 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T09:29:05+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote: Since Matthias pushed the fix upstream, let's finally close this one as fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T09:29:17+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote: Since Matthias pushed the fix upstream, let's finally close this one as fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/56 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-10-25T09:59:30+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Thanks to all ! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/57 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-11-23T18:04:39+00:00 Paul Dufresne wrote: Here on Ubuntu we have the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/107320 It seems we have someone with a similar but not identical monitor. servaas-xubuntu-user, bug #127827 (II) intel(0): Manufacturer: LPL Model: 2a00 Serial#: 0 (near miss!) (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 289 x 21 servaas-xubuntu-user (Problem in XUbuntu in general, not just GDM) X Window System Version 1.3.0 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3 Current Operating System: Linux ubuntu 2.6.22-8-generic #1 SMP Thu Jul 12 15:59:45 GMT 2007 i686 (==) intel(0): DPI set to (75, 75) His bug is reported in Ubuntu at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/127827 and it's Xorg.0.log file is at: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8675708/Xorg.0.log My believe is that the patch should be modified to add this monitor model (2a00). We also have 1 person with detected 40x30 mm screen, and one with 10mmx10mm screen. I don't think they are related to this bug, but if curious more info is at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/151311/comments/29 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-11-30T09:03:20+00:00 Mhopf-suse wrote: *** Bug 13458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/151311/comments/78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-01T11:16:30+00:00 Bugzi09-fdo-tormod wrote: Alois, can you please add Option "ModeDebug" "true" to your xorg.conf and attach the new log? Apparently there are several panels from Philips with product ID = 0 and not all of them need this quirk. I am wondering if there is some more identification we can use. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg- server/+bug/151311/comments/118 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-01T11:29:57+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: (In reply to comment #43) > Alois, can you please add Option "ModeDebug" "true" to your xorg.conf and > attach the new log? Apparently there are several panels from Philips with > product ID = 0 and not all of them need this quirk. I am wondering if there is > some more identification we can use. > yes, but now using xorg-server 1.6 and xf86-video-intel 2.6.99.902 will have any influence? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg- server/+bug/151311/comments/119 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-01T11:52:08+00:00 Info-aloisnespor wrote: Created an attachment (id=24444) ModeDebug On Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg- server/+bug/151311/comments/120 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-08T12:38:56+00:00 Orion-cora wrote: Reopening as there seems to be other models affected. I'll attach the Xorg.0.log with ModeDebug on for my system as well. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg- server/+bug/151311/comments/122 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-08T12:40:10+00:00 Orion-cora wrote: Created an attachment (id=25646) Xorg log xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.12.2-11.fc11.x86_64 HP Pavilion zv6000 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg- server/+bug/151311/comments/123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-03T11:27:48+00:00 Eric Anholt wrote: This bug report is way too big. The original bug should be fixed, and the reporter no longer has the hardware. If people have bugs with other monitors, please open your own bugs so you actually get some attention! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg- server/+bug/151311/comments/127 ** Changed in: xorg-server Importance: Unknown => Medium -- DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size - causes wacky font sizes on login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry Administrators, which is the registrant for Debian. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~registry Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~registry More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
