Under an #ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA please ... its still not clear (in general) whether "bug compatible" behavior or "logical/sensible behavior" is preferred. This would _NOT_ be the first bug in RPM that gets stuck into the concrete.
Personally, I'd like to just get through bug fixing (of the "logical/sensible" persuasion) and get on to adding dependency ranges, and attribute qualifiers, and trigger filtering, and file versioning, and ... enhancements. -- Conflicts: dependencies without release misfire https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633208 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry Administrators, which is the registrant for Unity Linux. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~registry Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~registry More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
