Dear Colleagues,

We have updated our author and institution rankings based on publications in 
core regional science journals during 2010-2014. A copy of the paper containing 
the updated rankings can be found at the following link: 
https://ideas.repec.org/p/okl/wpaper/1603.html
Ranking Authors and Institutions by Publications in Regional Science Journals: 
2010-2014
Downloadable! In this paper, authors and institutions are ranked based on the 
number of publications in ten core regional science journals during the period 
2010-2014. Alternative rankings are constructed by considering only 
publications in the top four of the ten journals and also by adjusting for 
journal impact factors. Two impact factors are calculated for each regional 
science journal. The first is based on citations by the other nine core 
regional science journals, and the second by citations from all journals in the 
database Scopus. Discussion is included regarding the patterns and consistency 
of the rankings across alternative criteria. Comparisons also are made to 
previous regional science publication rankings of authors and institutions.
Read more...<https://ideas.repec.org/p/okl/wpaper/1603.html>

The primary differences are the following.

1) All three issues of The Review of Regional Studies for 2014 are now 
reflected in the rankings.
2) One issue of the International Regional Science Review, which was 
incorrectly classified in SCOPUS has now been incorporated into the rankings.
3) One issue of Annals of Regional Science, which was incorrectly omitted from 
SCOPUS has now been incorporated (manually) into the rankings.
4) We corrected a few article records that were previously duplicated
5) We have added a table for the top 50 U.S. authors to parallel the already 
included table of U.S. institutions.

We will both be at NARSC in Portland should anyone wish to discuss the rankings 
with us.

With best regards,

Dan Rickman and John Winters


Reply via email to