--On Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:11 AM +0200 Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are disk drives slower with their caches disabled on LINEAR writes? Probably because sectors are so close together on the physical media. If you disable write caching, and are writing sectors 1001, 1002, 1003 etc., you tell it to write sector 1001, and it doesn't complete until it's written it, you IRQ the PC, and it sends the write out for 1002, which completes a little later. However, by this time 1002 has flown past the drive head, as it wasn't immediately queued on the drive. If you had only one sector of writeahead, this effect would disappear (but is just as theoretically dangerous if there is no way to force a flush() of the write cache). -- Alex Bligh
- [reiserfs-list] [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs... Beau Kuiper
- Re: [reiserfs-list] [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved... Chris Mason
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 impr... pcg
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved... Matthias Andree
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 ... pcg
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 impr... Nicholas Knight
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 ... Matthias Andree
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4... Nicholas Knight
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH... Nicholas Knight
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4... Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH... Matthias Andree
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved... Jorge Ner�n
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 ... Chris Mason
- [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 impr... Matthias Andree
