On Tuesday, 8. January 2002 00:20, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Chris has worked on this (dynamic journal size) for ages.
> > He told me something about it in the year 2000?
>
> Actually some of the namesys coders did this, it works pretty
> well. The current utilities have support for it, I expect the
> patches will get fed into 2.5.x.
>
> Is there any way (at present) to gague how much of the journal is
> presently being used (high/low water marks perhaps?).
>
> My guess is a busy server will want a full 32M journal (maybe even
> larger) by my laptop will suffice with only a fraction of that. It
> would be nice to measure this.
Sorry,
that I missed up the subject!
But all you good men understand me, of course...8-)))
Regards,
Dieter
