Thanks, I had no idea it allocated all the space right away, but it
still didn't work, the file got a bit bigger, not much.  It was 
73728 bytes big, I let the process run til my computer suddenly crashed,
here is an excert from syslog, there was ton of lines just like the
first 3 shown, from 12:01 til this last one then the kernel panic.  It
should be noted I've been getting kernel panics before too.  I think my
2nd chip of memory is bad.  I'm taking it out after I type this,
hopefully no kernel panics til then.  Any advice?

May 31 12:19:09 threshold kernel: hdd: read_intr: status=0x59 {
DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
May 31 12:19:09 threshold kernel: hdd: read_intr: error=0x40 {
UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=11310269, sector=446
May 31 12:19:09 threshold kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 16:45
(hdd), sector 446
May 31 12:19:14 threshold kernel: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception:
0000000000000004

Love,
Billy

On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:28, Dieter N�tzel wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 04:20,  Billy Transue wrote:
> 
> [-]
> > I've suffered a very similar problem and posted to the list earlier, I
> > did, dd_resuce -l dd.log /dev/hdd5 ./hdd5 and winded up w/ this:
> > dd_rescue: (info): ipos:         0.0k, opos:         0.0k,
> > xferd:         0.0k
> >                    errs:      0, errxfer:         0.0k,
> > succxfer:         0.0k
> >              +curr.rate:        0kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s,
> > avg.load:  0.0%
> >
> > it never changed, the file created hdd5 was 65536 bytes large.  The log
> > file was empty.  Am I doing something wrong?  Any info would be
> > appreciated.  Thanks in advance.
> 
> Bill, have you ever tried the (r)evers mode?
> A valid run on a 859.412k partition should look like this:
> 
> SunWave1 /tmp# time dd_rescue -r -l dd_rescue-sdb8.log /dev/sdb8 sdb8
> dd_rescue: (info): ipos:    859446.0k, opos:    859446.0k, xferd:         0.0k
>              -  *  errs:      0, errxfer:         0.0k, succxfer:         0.0k
>              +curr.rate:        0kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s, avg.load: 96.1%
> dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/sdb8 (859446.0k): Input/output error!
> dd_rescue: (info): ipos:    859445.5k, opos:    859445.5k, xferd:         0.5k
>              -  *  errs:      1, errxfer:         0.5k, succxfer:         0.0k
>              +curr.rate:      197kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s, avg.load: 96.0%
> dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/sdb8 (859445.5k): Input/output error!
> dd_rescue: (info): ipos:    859445.0k, opos:    859445.0k, xferd:         1.0k
>              -  *  errs:      2, errxfer:         1.0k, succxfer:         0.0k
>              +curr.rate:      252kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s, avg.load: 95.9%
> dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/sdb8 (859445.0k): Input/output error!
> dd_rescue: (info): ipos:    859444.5k, opos:    859444.5k, xferd:         1.5k
>              -  *  errs:      3, errxfer:         1.5k, succxfer:         0.0k
>              +curr.rate:      261kB/s, avg.rate:        1kB/s, avg.load: 95.8%
> dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/sdb8 (859444.5k): Input/output error!
> dd_rescue: (info): ipos:        54.0k, opos:        54.0k, xferd:    859392.0k
>              -     errs:      4, errxfer:         2.0k, succxfer:    859390.0k
>              +curr.rate:     2413kB/s, avg.rate:     2219kB/s, avg.load:  4.5%
> Summary for /dev/sdb8 -> sdb8:
> dd_rescue: (info): ipos:         0.0k, opos:         0.0k, xferd:    859446.0k
>              -     errs:      4, errxfer:         2.0k, succxfer:    859444.0k
>              +curr.rate:     2201kB/s, avg.rate:     2217kB/s, avg.load:  4.5%
> 0.530u 16.960s 6:27.67 4.5%     0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
> 
> SunWave1 /tmp# l dd_rescue-sdb8.log sdb8
> -rw-r-----    1 root     root         1713 Mai 31 18:15 dd_rescue-sdb8.log
> -rw-r-----    1 root     root     880072704 Mai 31 18:15 sdb8
> 
> Are you sure that you had write permission and enough space (!!!) on your 
> destination (in your case the current working directory)?
> 
> dd_rescue seems to allocate the whole needed disk space at the beginning!
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> -Dieter
> 
> BTW I've had "recovered" several (Winbloze) disks of our customers with 
> dd_rescue. But *nix FSes are much better to recover because of the better FS 
> redundancy and fsck tools after the dd_rescue run.
> 
> -- 
> Dieter N�tzel
> Graduate Student, Computer Science
> 
> University of Hamburg
> Department of Computer Science
> @home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to