On 06/05/2002 11:13 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 06/04/2002 03:12 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 23:28, Manuel Krause wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So, VMware is stable with it, too, on my well known "heavy-private-test"
> >>of it (running Norton SpeedDisk at least twice within a most recent
> >>VMware Win98). It doesn't show greatly different timings than to my
> >>setup before though having a different disk i/o pattern (due to the
> >>missing aa patches)... and me having a reduced RAM from 512to256MB at
> >>the moment. And I should be honest to say I can't give exact timings as
> >>the important disk contents changed during last weeks. But the
> >>disk-access-times/related-to-the-content are definitively _not_ higher
> >>than before!
> >
> >
> > same speed on 1/2 the ram isn't bad ;-)
> >
> [...]
> Don't know where to reply best...
[...]
BTW, what is this "only" diff good for (is it worth to recompile, I mean):
# diff '03-beta-data-logging-6.diff' '03-beta-data-logging-5.diff'
2777c2777
< + if (SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_num_lists > 512) {
---
> + if (SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_num_lists > 256) {
Thank you,
Manuel
>
> I was extraordinary glad to see the explicit wording of the mounted
> partition in the logs we missed for so long time!
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Manuel
>
