(Embedded
image moved "S. Alexander Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to file: 06/06/2002 02:14 PM
pic29705.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved "S. Alexander Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to file: 06/06/2002 02:14 PM
pic25352.pcx)
Can someone turn this off?
I am recieving large amounts of duplicate mail
from Valdis Kletnieks through the namesys
listserv.
-Alex-
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic13257.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic00081.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic15154.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic07244.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic00072.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic31655.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic01253.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic19373.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic27832.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic30803.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic04969.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic08117.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic11628.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic06033.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic18619.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic14738.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic07549.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic26942.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic27268.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to file: 06/06/2002 09:58 AM
> pic24632.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 13:25:05 +0400, Oleg Drokin said:
>
> > But MD5 may be identical for different files.
>
> Only a 2**128 chance of that. If you know a way to force a hash collision
> more frequently than that, the crypto world wants to hear from you.. ;)
>
> > Also this buys you nothing.
> > You write file in chunks, once file is identical to other file,
> > one of the files deleted. Looks like just more extra work (but some saved
> space
> > of course).
>
> A much more productive way to save space is file-system compression. AIX
> supports LZ-compressing each 4K block and then only saving as many 512 byte
> fragments as actually needed. It's a big win - /usr (even with all the
> binaries)
> needs about 30% less space, and I've seen over 50% for file systems with
> source trees in them...
> --
> Valdis Kletnieks
> Computer Systems Senior Engineer
> Virginia Tech
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
1-212-787-1914 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax