On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 04:14, Zeljko Brajdic wrote: > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 13:09, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 06:11, Zeljko Brajdic wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've applied quota patches for vanilla kernel-2.4.18 found at > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.18/ > > > Everything works perfectly except for checking quota with command `quota > > > -v username' if username have UID >65534. Interesting is that `repquota' > > > doesn't have that problem and showing. > > > > > > This is output of `quota': > > > > > > root@led 12:02 (/usr/src/linux) > quota -v bureq > > > quota: Error while getting quota from /dev/sda4 for 200000: Invalid argument > > > Disk quotas for user bureq (uid 200000): none > > > > Which disk format are you using? You can check this with debugreiserfs > > /dev/xxxxx > > > root@led 13:12 (/usr/src/linux) > debugreiserfs /dev/sda4 > > <-------------debugreiserfs, 2002-------------> > reiserfsprogs 3.x.1b > > > Filesystem state: consistency is not checked after last mounting > > Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x804 of format 3.6 with standard journal
This means your reiserfs disk can support the high uids. > > > We have found "error". :) In fs/dquot.c at line 2057 exists if > statement: > > if (id & ~0xFFFF) > goto out; > > Is this feature or bug?! :) This have been found in vanilla kernel-2.4.18 This check is not in a quota patched kernel. sys_quotactl isn't in fs/dquot.c with the quota patches applied. Did you apply all of the patches in my quota directory? I think so, since the kernel wouldn't compile otherwise ;-) quota -v high_uid_user works fine for me, which version of the quota utils do you have installed? -chris
